> sage: f1 = pari([i._pari_('y') for i in f.list()]).Pol()
well, this is use Polrev()
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://grou
On 17 mar, 10:13, John Cremona wrote:
> For an example of how polynomials over number fields are converted
> into pari polynomials, see
> sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx, in the factor function.
> This is the code already used to factor polynomials over number fields
> by converting
For an example of how polynomials over number fields are converted
into pari polynomials, see
sage/rings/polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx, in the factor function.
This is the code already used to factor polynomials over number fields
by converting to pari. It is more complicated than one would li
On 16 mar, 23:27, daveloeffler wrote:
> Can you give an example where polynomials are being passed incorrectly
> to Pari? There are some known bugs in Pari's own factorisation
> routines (fixed in Pari 2.3.5, which should hopefully be in the next
> Sage release), but if there are problems transl
On Mar 16, 8:29 pm, luisfe wrote:
> The issue is that for univariates polynomials over absolute number
> fields, the implementation is just the generic one using Euclidean
> algorithm. I tried passing to pari but I am afraid that the pari
> coertion for these polynomials is incorrect. Is this a
