> And we will try to fix this soon.
Done at #18666 [1] (needs_review)
Nathann
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18666
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
> Success!
>
> Thanks for the help.
You can remove the modification that you made to that file, it is
useless now. You probably won't even need it next time you will update
your version of Sage (though you may need it if you run 'make
distclean' again).
And we will try to fix this soon.
Nathann
Success!
Thanks for the help.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 8:25:59 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> Yo !
>
> > which will take several hours, or is some variant of the following
> better:
>
> The second should work. No reason to destroy what you already built I'd
> say.
>
> Nathann
>
> git-trac should never be imported in Sage, and it doesn't look that way from
> the traceback.
Oh. True. It seems that /home/davidp/sage-devel/git-trac-command/ is
SAGE_ROOT O_o
> SAGERUNTIME should depend on PEXPECT, directly or indirectly.
Yes yes yes, that makes sense. But right now it d
git-trac should never be imported in Sage, and it doesn't look that way
from the traceback.
SAGERUNTIME should depend on PEXPECT, directly or indirectly.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 5:32:35 PM UTC+2, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> H... Even if it works it is not a good fix :-/
>
> Volker, wh
H... Even if it works it is not a good fix :-/
Volker, what do you think of this scenario:
- the git-trac module has been installed before conway_polynomials
- you don't need pexpect to *install* git-trac, but you need pexpect
to load the git-trac modules
- installing conway_polynomials calls
Yo !
> which will take several hours, or is some variant of the following better:
The second should work. No reason to destroy what you already built I'd say.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this grou
Sure, I can try that. Should I enter:
> make distclean && make
which will take several hours, or is some variant of the following better:
> export SAGE_KEEP_BUILT_SPKGS='yes'
> make
Thanks.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 8:17:07 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> David: there is in SAGE_
> So that explains your error. You need to check the build log to find out
> why; presumably some dependency failed.
conway_polynomial does not state a dependency on pexpect. Couldn't
this be the problem?
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sag
David: there is in SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/conway_polynomials/ a file
named 'dependencies', whose first line should be:
| $(SAGERUNTIME)
Could you replace it with
$(INST)/$(PEXPECT) | $(SAGERUNTIME)
And tell us if running 'make' works better then?
Nathann
On 10 June 2015 at 17:13, Nathan
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 4:34:01 PM UTC+2, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> There is no logs/pkgs/pexpect-2.0.p6.log.
>
So that explains your error. You need to check the build log to find out
why; presumably some dependency failed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Sage version 6.8.beta3, released 2015-06-04
There is no logs/pkgs/pexpect-2.0.p6.log.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 7:17:30 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Which version of Sage are you trying to build and whats in
> logs/pkgs/pexpect-2.0.p6.log? The first error is relevant, the last error
Which version of Sage are you trying to build and whats in
logs/pkgs/pexpect-2.0.p6.log? The first error is relevant, the last error
is probably not.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 4:09:11 PM UTC+2, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> I've already tried that. I get the same error message.
>
> On Wedne
I've already tried that. I get the same error message.
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 6:55:00 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Try to rebuild everything from scratch (make distclean && make). Will take
> a while...
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 3:13:15 PM UTC+2, David Perkinson wrote:
Try to rebuild everything from scratch (make distclean && make). Will take
a while...
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 3:13:15 PM UTC+2, David Perkinson wrote:
>
> I am still trying to post revisions to sandpile.py. The next issue is
> compiling sage with the git-trac directory. The file pexpe
15 matches
Mail list logo
