[sage-devel] Re: Trac slowness

2013-12-13 Thread Jason Grout
On 12/13/13, 11:21 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Wow, much faster! Thanks! (Trac was so slow as to be almost unusable.) Yes, amazing! Thanks, Volker! -Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac slowness

2013-12-13 Thread Robert Bradshaw
Wow, much faster! Thanks! (Trac was so slow as to be almost unusable.) On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > I've also added a robots.txt so that web crawlers don't do expensive > operations. We of course want tickets to be indexed, but not the extremely > slow trac changeset vie

[sage-devel] Re: Trac slowness

2013-12-13 Thread Volker Braun
I've also added a robots.txt so that web crawlers don't do expensive operations. We of course want tickets to be indexed, but not the extremely slow trac changeset view. If you think you have anything to add, this is what I put into place: http://trac.sagemath.org/robots.txt -- You received t

[sage-devel] Re: trac slowness

2011-08-25 Thread leif
On 25 Aug., 00:54, William Stein wrote: > Hi, > > I reconfigured apache2 so now (way, way) more processes are allocated > to serving trac.  This means that instead of trac being temporarily > "down" due to two users doing a search at the same time, many users > can use trac at once. > > Let me kno