On May 8, 2:33 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aside from that it is *highly*
> > recommended to build from source if you are developing since mixing
> > and matching different compiler releases [even on OSX] can lead to odd
> > results, i.e. Heisenbugs and segfaults.
Hi Marshall,
> Aside from that it is *highly*
> recommended to build from source if you are developing since mixing
> and matching different compiler releases [even on OSX] can lead to odd
> results, i.e. Heisenbugs and segfaults.
Maybe a note to that effect should be put on the download page, or in
the READM
On May 8, 12:21 am, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 7, 1:19 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wonder what version the "30 seconds" comment was from. The code
> > base is probably growing faster than processor/hard drive speeds.
>
> > On my Macbook, 2.4 Ghz inte
No - sorry for not being clearer - this is from a source install.
-M. Hampton
On May 7, 5:21 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 7, 1:19 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wonder what version the "30 seconds" comment was from. The code
> > base is probably growi
On May 7, 1:19 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder what version the "30 seconds" comment was from. The code
> base is probably growing faster than processor/hard drive speeds.
>
> On my Macbook, 2.4 Ghz intel chip, 5400rpm drive, a first clone of 3.0
> takes about 1 minute, the s
I wonder what version the "30 seconds" comment was from. The code
base is probably growing faster than processor/hard drive speeds.
On my Macbook, 2.4 Ghz intel chip, 5400rpm drive, a first clone of 3.0
takes about 1 minute, the second clone 30 seconds.
-M. Hampton
On May 7, 1:15 pm, John H Pa
On May 7, 11:35 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 7-May-08, at 11:14 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > > In Section 7.1 of the Sage Programming Guide, it says
>
> > >> Creating clones of a reposi
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7-May-08, at 11:14 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> >
> > In Section 7.1 of the Sage Programming Guide, it says
> >
> >> Creating clones of a repository should be fairly fast, e.g., about
> >> 30 seconds.
> >
>
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just installed a fresh copy of Sage on my Mac and ran 'sage -clone
> > blah', and it took almost 15 minutes to complete. Running 'sage -clone
> > temp' a second time took just over one minute. Neither of these, and
On 7-May-08, at 11:14 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> In Section 7.1 of the Sage Programming Guide, it says
>
>> Creating clones of a repository should be fairly fast, e.g., about
>> 30 seconds.
>
> I just installed a fresh copy of Sage on my Mac and ran 'sage -clone
> blah', and it took almost
10 matches
Mail list logo
