[sage-devel] Re: the state of dense linear algebra in Sage

2012-03-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote: > On Mar 2, 2:59 am, Martin Albrecht > wrote: >> which collects this information. I am not done yet filling it in, but I have >> to catch a train now. Meaning: knock yourselves out adding/filling in your >> favourite base ring :) > > Not my favorite

[sage-devel] Re: the state of dense linear algebra in Sage

2012-03-02 Thread Rob Beezer
On Mar 2, 2:59 am, Martin Albrecht wrote: > which collects this information. I am not done yet filling it in, but I have > to catch a train now. Meaning: knock yourselves out adding/filling in your > favourite base ring :) Not my favorite base rings, but ones I can comment on. I'm partial to QQ

Re: [sage-devel] Re: the state of dense linear algebra in Sage

2012-03-02 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Friday 02 Mar 2012, Simon King wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On 2 Mrz., 11:59, Martin Albrecht > > wrote: > > Meaning: knock yourselves out adding/filling in your > > > > favourite base ring :) > > I added some information on my MeatAxe fork wrapper (comparison with > Magma missing, I'm workin

[sage-devel] Re: the state of dense linear algebra in Sage

2012-03-02 Thread Simon King
Hi Martin, On 2 Mrz., 11:59, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Meaning: knock yourselves out adding/filling in your > favourite base ring :) I added some information on my MeatAxe fork wrapper (comparison with Magma missing, I'm working on it now), even though #12103 is still in need of review (hint hin