[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-28 Thread Bill Janssen
I've now placed a new version of pil-1.1.7.p0.spkg at http://uplib.parc.com/misc/pil-1.1.7.p0.spkg. This contains the .hg files, but I'm still not sure I've got that correct. By the way, spkg-check still runs on OS X, but not on Ubuntu. I've tested it with Sage 4.7.2 on both; seems to build and

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-22 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:45:28 PM UTC-8, Bill Janssen wrote: > > On Nov 22, 12:53 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > > So pil-1.1.6.p5 *is* the old one. > > pil-1.1.6.p4 is the old one. > > > Remove the "src" directory from that > > one, replacing it with the new source. Modify any patches as ne

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-22 Thread Bill Janssen
On Nov 22, 12:53 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > So pil-1.1.6.p5 *is* the old one. pil-1.1.6.p4 is the old one. > Remove the "src" directory from that > one, replacing it with the new source.  Modify any patches as necessary, > along with the spkg-install, spkg-check, and SPKG.txt files, as I said

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-22 Thread John H Palmieri
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:42:41 PM UTC-8, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > You should build your new spkg by starting with the old one > > Except that the "old one" doesn't exist -- this is pil-1.1.7.p0, not > pil-1.1.6.p5. > > Still not sure how to go about this -- an example (perhaps it's in th

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-22 Thread Bill Janssen
> You should build your new spkg by starting with the old one Except that the "old one" doesn't exist -- this is pil-1.1.7.p0, not pil-1.1.6.p5. Still not sure how to go about this -- an example (perhaps it's in the docs) would be helpful. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@g

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-22 Thread Bill Janssen
On Nov 17, 5:07 pm, kcrisman wrote: > On Nov 17, 5:10 pm, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > OK, the libjpeg now builds in place. > > > I see that on my Ubuntu box, the spkg-check file isn't being run > > automatically.  Any ideas as to why that might be? > > Did you set > > SAGE_CHECK=yes > > ?  That is

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-22 Thread Bill Janssen
OK, I'll look at that this long weekend. Bill On Nov 17, 2:07 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bill Janssen wrote: > >> Some issues with this spkg: > > >>  - The mercurial repository is completely missing. > > > Yes, it's not a patch to the Sage sources, so there's no

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-17 Thread kcrisman
On Nov 17, 5:10 pm, Bill Janssen wrote: > OK, the libjpeg now builds in place. > > I see that on my Ubuntu box, the spkg-check file isn't being run > automatically.  Any ideas as to why that might be? Did you set SAGE_CHECK=yes ? That is the flag that sets that to run. Otherwise Sage would

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-17 Thread Bill Janssen
OK, the libjpeg now builds in place. I see that on my Ubuntu box, the spkg-check file isn't being run automatically. Any ideas as to why that might be? Bill On Nov 17, 1:49 pm, Bill Janssen wrote: > >  - You shouldn't build libjpeg in /tmp/..., but probably in a subdirectory > > of SAGE_ROOT/s

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-17 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 1:49:39 PM UTC-8, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > Some issues with this spkg: > > > > - The mercurial repository is completely missing. > > Yes, it's not a patch to the Sage sources, so there's no Mercurial > stuff as there would be if it were. > Every spkg should

Re: [sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-17 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bill Janssen wrote: >> Some issues with this spkg: >> >>  - The mercurial repository is completely missing. > > Yes, it's not a patch to the Sage sources, so there's no Mercurial > stuff as there would be if it were. Each spkg has its own Mercurial repository. L

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-17 Thread Bill Janssen
> Some issues with this spkg: > >  - The mercurial repository is completely missing. Yes, it's not a patch to the Sage sources, so there's no Mercurial stuff as there would be if it were. >  - There are lots of backup files around ("SPKG.txt~", etc.). I've put up a new version which should fix t

[sage-devel] Re: tentative PIL-1.1.7.p0.spkg

2011-11-17 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 1:17:45 PM UTC-8, Bill Janssen wrote: > > I've put up my first try at a PIL 1.1.7 spkg at misc/pil-1.1.7.p0.spkg >. > > Please tell me what I did wrong :-). > I would open up a ticket, makin