And speaking of version bumps, there is a trivial IPython update that has
been sitting on trac for two weeks:
http://trac.sagemath.org/14810
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Interesting stats.
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> I'd be happy if there were more frequent reviews of updated packages, for
> example I packaged Gap-4.6.3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/14039) and it just
> lingered on trac until 4.6.4 came out. IMHO we should just get rid of so
Sorry if I wasn't clear, the package maintainer must of course make sure
that the doctests pass. Usually there are some minor changes, e.g. we do
doctest the GAP version number which will always change. Or the output
order of the upstream source changes. That does require some good judgement
to
Hi Volker,
On 2013-07-05, Volker Braun wrote:
> I'd be happy if there were more frequent reviews of updated packages, for
> example I packaged Gap-4.6.3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/14039) and it just
> lingered on trac until 4.6.4 came out. IMHO we should just get rid of some
> of the red tap fo
I'd be happy if there were more frequent reviews of updated packages, for
example I packaged Gap-4.6.3 (http://trac.sagemath.org/14039) and it just
lingered on trac until 4.6.4 came out. IMHO we should just get rid of some
of the red tap for pure version bumps; If the package maintainer makes an
