> Sounds like the CCLI team might
> have another example of how development is driven.
What is that, CCLI team?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
On Jan 8, 2:17 pm, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> > Just FYI, we don't have access to your home directory on sagenb :) so
> > you may want to publish that, with the option that it updates when you
> > make further refinements.
>
> Yes, that was not the right link, this one
> ishttp://www.sagenb.org/home/p
> Just FYI, we don't have access to your home directory on sagenb :) so
> you may want to publish that, with the option that it updates when you
> make further refinements.
Yes, that was not the right link, this one is
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1328/
BTW: it was already published
--
To post
On Jan 8, 12:51 pm, Oscar Lazo wrote:
> I've finished adding Jason's code and suggestions. Those can be found
> at
>
> http://www.sagenb.org/home/omologos/9/
>
Just FYI, we don't have access to your home directory on sagenb :) so
you may want to publish that, with the option that it updates whe
I've finished adding Jason's code and suggestions. Those can be found
at
http://www.sagenb.org/home/omologos/9/
and the corresponding tickets at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7850
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7869
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7872
I still ha
Oscar Lazo wrote:
On 6 ene, 12:23, Jason Grout wrote:
That was an intentionally simple example to illustrate the problem.
Here's something that is more nontrivial:
def f(x,y):
if x>pi:
return y
else:
return -y
spherical_plot3d(f, (x,0,2*pi), (y,0,pi))
I have no idea how
On 6 ene, 12:23, Jason Grout wrote:
> That was an intentionally simple example to illustrate the problem.
> Here's something that is more nontrivial:
> def f(x,y):
> if x>pi:
> return y
> else:
> return -y
>
> spherical_plot3d(f, (x,0,2*pi), (y,0,pi))
I have no idea how to m
Oscar Lazo wrote:
On 6 ene, 01:16, Jason Grout wrote:
I've made some comments athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7850
I saw your comments (i'll edit the ticket when i'm sure how many of
those there
should be).
1. To be consistent with the plotting functions, it would also need to s
On 6 ene, 01:16, Jason Grout wrote:
> I've made some comments athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7850
I saw your comments (i'll edit the ticket when i'm sure how many of
those there
should be).
> 1. To be consistent with the plotting functions, it would also need to
> support something
Oscar Lazo wrote:
I have published my own transform_plot3d
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1323/
I was unaware of yours.
Thanks again for working on this!
I've made some comments at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7850
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-
I have published my own transform_plot3d
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1323/
I was unaware of yours.
On 5 ene, 10:48, Jason Grout wrote:
> The following is what I'd like to think of as the "standard" way:
>
> plot(f, (var1, var1_start, var1_end), (var2, var2_start, var2_end))
That's how i made
Oscar Lazo wrote:
On 5 ene, 09:45, Jason Grout wrote:
This is fantastic! Thank you very much.
You are very welcome :D
If you have the time or inclination, maybe you could also generalize
this to a cylindrical coordinate plotting function. In fact, I wonder
how easy it would be to make a f
Oscar Lazo wrote:
On 5 ene, 09:45, Jason Grout wrote:
This is fantastic! Thank you very much.
You are very welcome :D
If you have the time or inclination, maybe you could also generalize
this to a cylindrical coordinate plotting function. In fact, I wonder
how easy it would be to make a f
On 5 ene, 08:21, mhampton wrote:
> Congratulations! Do you have a trac account yet?
I probably have one, but i can't remember my username.
I'll ask wstein for help ;-)
> One thing you probably want to change is the assumption of variables
> phi and theta. I recommend looking at the source of
On 5 ene, 09:45, Jason Grout wrote:
> This is fantastic! Thank you very much.
You are very welcome :D
> If you have the time or inclination, maybe you could also generalize
> this to a cylindrical coordinate plotting function. In fact, I wonder
> how easy it would be to make a function that to
Oscar Lazo wrote:
> Well, this is basically a clone of mathematicas "SphericalPlot3d" only
> that i thought the 3d was redundant.
>
> I've published the function here: http://www.sagenb.org/pub/1319/ .
> And cloned the examles in
> http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/SphericalPlot3D.html
Congratulations! Do you have a trac account yet?
One thing you probably want to change is the assumption of variables
phi and theta. I recommend looking at the source of something such as
plot_vector_field3d.py (in plot/plot3d) for an example of setting up
the arguments using setup_for_eval_on_g
17 matches
Mail list logo
