[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-25 Thread cwitty
On Oct 25, 9:14 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/25/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/25/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For example, does the Lisp entry in > > > mercurial-0.9.5 python=27386,sh=8300,tcl=3484,lisp=1411,ansic=1364 > > >make s

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-25 Thread mabshoff
On Oct 25, 6:14 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/25/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > On 10/25/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There are some real surprises on that list. MPFR has many more lines > > > of code than I thought,

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-25 Thread David Joyner
On 10/25/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/25/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are some real surprises on that list. MPFR has many more lines > > of code than I thought, Pari many fewer lines of code. It's amazing > > what it achieves with such a small code b

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-25 Thread William Stein
On 10/25/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some real surprises on that list. MPFR has many more lines > of code than I thought, Pari many fewer lines of code. It's amazing > what it achieves with such a small code base. I think one should take everything in that table with a gr

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-25 Thread Bill Page
I was a little surprised by the number lisp:340210 (6.96%) For example, does the Lisp entry in mercurial-0.9.5 python=27386,sh=8300,tcl=3484,lisp=1411,ansic=1364 make sense? As far as I know mercurial does not use any Lisp, or does it? Regards, Bill Page. On 10/24/07, William Ste

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-25 Thread Bill Hart
There are some real surprises on that list. MPFR has many more lines of code than I thought, Pari many fewer lines of code. It's amazing what it achieves with such a small code base. FLINT is a bloated pig compared to NTL, given what the two packages actually do. What's really amazing is that GM

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-24 Thread William Stein
See http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/2.8.9.rc1-sloccount.html for a readable version of these tables. On 10/24/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry to reply to myself so quickly, but as Carl Witty pointed out I > need to run the code with --multiproject. In addition

[sage-devel] Re: sloccount of sage-2.8.9.rc1

2007-10-24 Thread mabshoff
Sorry to reply to myself so quickly, but as Carl Witty pointed out I need to run the code with --multiproject. In addition we now count pxd, pxi and pyx as python. With those settings we do get slighly smaller number, but still very impressive results: SLOCDirectory SLOC-by-Language (So