On Nov 15, 6:40 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Nov 13, 6:45 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > Maxima has a very large number of very specific types of
> > simplifications/expansions. It allows for quite a bit of control.
> > That said, the main reason our Maxima stuff is slow is because we use
> > 'p
On Nov 13, 6:45 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Maxima has a very large number of very specific types of
> simplifications/expansions. It allows for quite a bit of control.
> That said, the main reason our Maxima stuff is slow is because we use
> 'pexpect' to communicate with it. Nils Bruin has a patch all
On Nov 15, 10:56 am, Ben Goodrich wrote:
> Thanks for the tip, which seems to have worked. I opened a ticket
> (10268), attached my patch, and uploaded a benchmark.
Now I have a un-minimal example of using GiNaC's normal function that
finishes in about 1 minute when done directly in the GiNaC she
On Nov 13, 9:45 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> That's a little orthogonal to your main question, which I should know
> the answer to, but have forgotten off hand. Might this be in sage/
> libs/ginac/ ?
Thanks for the tip, which seems to have worked. I opened a ticket
(10268), attached my patch, and uploa
On Nov 13, 1:39 pm, Ben Goodrich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The simplify_rational method has three choices for Maxima functions,
> but I wanted to try GiNaC's normal method described here
>
> http://www.ginac.de/tutorial/Rational-expressions.html#Rational-expre...
>
> to see if it was faster. Has someone
