[sage-devel] Re: segfault one-liner

2009-10-03 Thread kcrisman
On Oct 2, 11:06 pm, Tom Boothby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > > This is fixed in some trac ticket. Hang on a second... #5556. Go > > ahead and review the patch! > > Nope, that doesn't do the job. Do you want to fix it on that ticket > or should I make another?

[sage-devel] Re: segfault one-liner

2009-10-02 Thread Tom Boothby
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > This is fixed in some trac ticket.  Hang on a second... #5556. Go > ahead and review the patch! Nope, that doesn't do the job. Do you want to fix it on that ticket or should I make another? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~---

[sage-devel] Re: segfault one-liner

2009-10-02 Thread Tom Boothby
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, kcrisman wrote: > > This is fixed in some trac ticket.  Hang on a second... #5556. Go > ahead and review the patch!  I discovered this completely by accident > while fixing another gamma bug.  Nasty, isn't it? Nice! I'll review that tonight. > > - kcrisman > >

[sage-devel] Re: segfault one-liner

2009-10-02 Thread kcrisman
This is fixed in some trac ticket. Hang on a second... #5556. Go ahead and review the patch! I discovered this completely by accident while fixing another gamma bug. Nasty, isn't it? - kcrisman On Oct 2, 1:51 pm, Tom Boothby wrote: > Intentional: > > cython("print (0)[0]") > > Unintentional: