[sage-devel] Re: sage optional packages

On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 11:02:32 PM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 11:11:03 PM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: All these packages are tested automatically on all supported platforms on GH Actions, on every beta release. See for example https://github.com/sagemath/sage/act

[sage-devel] Re: sage optional packages

Isn't there a subtle difference between `ptestlong` and `ptestalllong` ? Le lundi 29 juillet 2024 à 08:02:32 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 11:11:03 PM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Hi William, > > On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 5:35:29 AM UTC+1 William Stein wrote: >

[sage-devel] Re: sage optional packages

On Sunday, July 28, 2024 at 11:11:03 PM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: Hi William, On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 5:35:29 AM UTC+1 William Stein wrote: I'm curious about the testing and installation support for the optional packages listed on the SageMath documentation page here

[sage-devel] Re: sage optional packages

Hi William, On Friday, July 26, 2024 at 5:35:29 AM UTC+1 William Stein wrote: I'm curious about the testing and installation support for the optional packages listed on the SageMath documentation page here . All these packages

[sage-devel] Re: sage optional packages

FWIW I'm regularly testing with a few optional packages but no comprehensive tests: packages=[ '4ti2', 'benzene', 'beautifulsoup4', 'biopython', 'database_cremona_ellcurve', 'database_jones_numfield', 'da