On Monday, 19 March 2012 13:22:55 UTC+8, Akshay wrote:
>
> I'm curious, are there Lisp implementations that run on ARM, upon which
> Maxima can be compiled ? I guess ECL will work (not sure though).'
>
we basically have a complete port of Sage on Linux ARM, including,
certainly, ECL and Maxima
Le dimanche 18 mars, Akshay a écrit:
> I'm curious, are there Lisp implementations that run on ARM, upon
> which Maxima can be compiled ? I guess ECL will work (not sure
> though).
Sage is ported on ubuntu/ARM already ; and ecl mostly works, apart for
a single failing doctest :
http://sourceforge.
I'm curious, are there Lisp implementations that run on ARM, upon which
Maxima can be compiled ? I guess ECL will work (not sure though).
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 at 09:34PM +0530, Jeh Agarwal wrote:
> but still its a long way till it becomes common...how many would have
> such powerful devices now???
Right now: very few. But what about a year from now? Two years?
Two years ago at my university, smartphones were something that only
rich
Le dimanche 18 mars, Jeh Agarwal a écrit:
> but still its a long way till it becomes common...how many would have
> such powerful devices now???
Good code just ports itself. Especially if it's possible to do it by
morsels.
It's possible to make sage more flexible already, so it handles the
future
Jeh Agarwal writes:
> but still its a long way till it becomes common...how many would have such
> powerful devices now???
Right, I don't think anyone is disagreeing with you. The main priority
is to make remote operation of Sage possible (and easy, and nice
looking, and useful) on mobile devices
but still its a long way till it becomes common...how many would have such
powerful devices now???
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, 18 March 2012 00:48:48 UTC+8, Harald Schilly wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:14:17 PM UTC+1, Jeh Agarwal wr
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 00:48:48 UTC+8, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:14:17 PM UTC+1, Jeh Agarwal wrote:
>>
>> thats great! everything can be packed then..but will an app that heavy be
>> acceptable???
>>
>
> well, why not. But regardless of that, you would still e
Le samedi 17 mars, Harald Schilly a écrit:
>
>
> On Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:14:17 PM UTC+1, Jeh Agarwal wrote:
> >
> > thats great! everything can be packed then..but will an app that
> > heavy be acceptable???
> >
>
> well, why not. But regardless of that, you would still either have a
> cl
On Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:14:17 PM UTC+1, Jeh Agarwal wrote:
>
> thats great! everything can be packed then..but will an app that heavy be
> acceptable???
>
well, why not. But regardless of that, you would still either have a
clumsy command-line or the full blown notebook in your tiny web
thats great! everything can be packed then..but will an app that heavy be
acceptable???
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Yes, Android ARM ( != Linux ARM)
>
> On the plus side, Google recently increased the maximum app size to 4GB so
> at least we would be able to pack every
Yes, Android ARM ( != Linux ARM)
On the plus side, Google recently increased the maximum app size to 4GB so
at least we would be able to pack everything into an apk ;-)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sag
Le vendredi 16 mars, Dima Pasechnik a écrit:
> On Saturday, 17 March 2012 08:23:47 UTC+8, Volker Braun wrote:
> >
> > I see the arm port as complimentary to the sage app. At one point
> > we'll probably want to have an optional server that you can run on
> > your device, and fall back to sagemath.o
On Saturday, 17 March 2012 08:23:47 UTC+8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I see the arm port as complimentary to the sage app. At one point we'll
> probably want to have an optional server that you can run on your device,
> and fall back to sagemath.org otherwise. But the scope of the GSoC
> project
I see the arm port as complimentary to the sage app. At one point we'll
probably want to have an optional server that you can run on your device,
and fall back to sagemath.org otherwise. But the scope of the GSoC project
is to develop the Sage UI, not to port the Sage server. A full arm port is
On Friday, March 16, 2012 11:10:44 PM UTC+1, Christopher Swenson wrote:
>
> … so we wouldn't have a full port of Sage on the device at all.
>
>
yes, and i also think, that this won't have so much benefit at all
(additionally to the ARM vs. x86 architecture problems). I think, a focus
on a good
Oh, my bad. It looks like we intended what you said -- so we wouldn't have
a full port of Sage on the device at all.
--Christopher
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 15:08, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 3/16/12 4:57 PM, Christopher Swenson wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have a little bit of Android and Sage experience
On 3/16/12 4:57 PM, Christopher Swenson wrote:
Hi!
I have a little bit of Android and Sage experience, so I thought I would
give you a tip or two to get started.
I would imagine that the mentors of this project saw this as roughly
four phases:
1. Get up to speed on Android development. This me
18 matches
Mail list logo
