Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-02-03 Thread Neal Harris
I'm not sure if this has been reported already, but I just had an error while trying to build Sage 5.6 on 10.8.2: In file included from /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Headers/CGDisplayStream.h:11:0, from /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Heade

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-06 Thread Volker Braun
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 11:16:10 PM UTC, Robert Zeier wrote: > I can share the updates and/or the diffs. > Did you mean http://trac.sagemath.org/13898 ? > Should I ask for a trac account ? > Please do. Instructions are on the Sage trac homepage. -- You received this message because you are s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-06 Thread Robert Zeier
I can share the updates and/or the diffs. Did you mean http://trac.sagemath.org/13898 ? Should I ask for a trac account ? Am Samstag, 5. Januar 2013 10:29:35 UTC+1 schrieb Volker Braun: > > Can you post your updated spkgs to > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13309, or at least the diffs

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-05 Thread Volker Braun
Can you post your updated spkgs to http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13309, or at least the diffs? On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 12:26:12 PM UTC, Robert Zeier wrote: > > I ended up patching also python and R in the same way as mercurial. > @Volker: Thanks for showing me how to do this.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-02 Thread Robert Zeier
I ended up patching also python and R in the same way as mercurial. @Volker: Thanks for showing me how to do this. Everything did build with the patches for mercurial, python, and R! Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 10:08:11 UTC+1 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer: > > On 2013-01-01 21:31, Robert Zeier wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-01-01 21:31, Robert Zeier wrote: > I do not see how this would be possible as > I did upgrade Xcode to the latest version some time ago > and I have never installed a "second" version of Xcode: Perhaps you still have some remnants of some old XCode on your system which cause this problem.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-02 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2013-01-01 20:01, Volker Braun wrote: > The following ticket says that this was fixed in XCode 4.5. Are you sure > you don't have an old version floating around? > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13309 It's also strange that nobody else reported this problem. -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-01 Thread Volker Braun
Can you do another build where you replace the old mercurial with this one: http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/mercurial-2.2.2.p1.spkg This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/13898 On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 8:31:41 PM UTC, Robert Zeier wrote: > > /usr/bin/xcodebuild -version > Xcode 4.5.2

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-01 Thread Robert Zeier
I do not see how this would be possible as I did upgrade Xcode to the latest version some time ago and I have never installed a "second" version of Xcode: /usr/bin/xcodebuild -version Xcode 4.5.2 Build version 4G2008a I did find some strange files but I do not think that they are the problem: 1

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-01 Thread Volker Braun
The following ticket says that this was fixed in XCode 4.5. Are you sure you don't have an old version floating around? http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13309 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send e

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-01 Thread Robert Zeier
How could I figure this out? Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 19:05:12 UTC+1 schrieb Volker Braun: > > Somebody with a Mac should try to figure out if we only need it for > mercurial or whether its needed globally... > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sa

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-01 Thread Volker Braun
This is Apple in their infinite wisdom relying on non-standard C extensions in the system headers. Somebody with a Mac should try to figure out if we only need it for mercurial or whether its needed globally... On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 4:47:47 PM UTC, Robert Zeier wrote: > > Yes, everythin

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2013-01-01 Thread Robert Zeier
Yes, everything compiles with this flag. Thanks! Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2012 11:08:37 UTC+1 schrieb Volker Braun: > > Does it work if you set > > CFLAGS="-DOS_OBJECT_USE_OBJC=0" > export CFLAGS > make > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" g

[sage-devel] Re: sage 5.6.beta1 build error (mercurial-2.2.2.p0) on OS X 10.8.2

2012-12-31 Thread Volker Braun
Does it work if you set CFLAGS="-DOS_OBJECT_USE_OBJC=0" export CFLAGS make On Sunday, December 30, 2012 6:11:14 PM UTC, Robert Zeier wrote: > > I am trying to build sage 5.6.beta1 from source, > but mercurial does not build. (The same problem > also applies to sage 5.5) Xcode 4.5.2 is install