On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 9:11 AM Marc Mezzarobba wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > The 3 people who expressed interest in being on the Sage dev prize
> > committee are me, John Cremona, and Karl-Dieter Crisman.
>
> Didn't Samuel Lelièvre also volunteer?
Yes, and Karl-Dieter actually didn't. The
William Stein wrote:
> The 3 people who expressed interest in being on the Sage dev prize
> committee are me, John Cremona, and Karl-Dieter Crisman.
Didn't Samuel Lelièvre also volunteer?
--
Marc
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
Hi William,
Le dimanche 1 mai 2022 à 19:24:54 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit :
> Hello Sage-Devel,
>
> The 3 people who expressed interest in being on the Sage dev prize
> committee are me, John Cremona, and Karl-Dieter Crisman. Would
> anybody else like to be on the committee?
Sorry for t
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Kannappan Sampath wrote:
> Thank you all for suggesting that I take a look at GIT. I think I feel
> better now. But, still I have gotten some questions. I am trying to review
> 16091.
>
> I have checked out the ncohen's 16091 branch and have it as a local
> branch.
>From the preview of the updated docs in the already-mentioned ticket #16030:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/doc/developer/walk_through.html#rebuilding-sage
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:06:44 PM UTC+1, KnS wrote:
>
> Thank you all for suggesting that I take a look at GIT. I think
Thank you all for suggesting that I take a look at GIT. I think I feel
better now. But, still I have gotten some questions. I am trying to review
16091.
I have checked out the ncohen's 16091 branch and have it as a local branch.
I would like to now let sage now that there has been a change in its
After reading a bit about SCM and git I would advise against use of sage
-dev.
I had used sage -dev the last weeks but now I exclusively do 'git trac'
which
does all I need but much better than sage -dev.
Documentation is in
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16030
Regards,
--
You received this
2014-04-23 7:10 UTC+02:00, William Stein :
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Kannappan Sampath
> wrote:
>> I also need more git hand holding: I am trying to attach some code from
>> my
>> local branch to a ticket. I did the following:
>>
>> Apples-MacBook-Pro:combinat apple$ sage -dev checkout --
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Kannappan Sampath wrote:
> I also need more git hand holding: I am trying to attach some code from my
> local branch to a ticket. I did the following:
>
> Apples-MacBook-Pro:combinat apple$ sage -dev checkout --ticket 16211
> On ticket #16211 with associated local
I also need more git hand holding: I am trying to attach some code from my
local branch to a ticket. I did the following:
Apples-MacBook-Pro:combinat apple$ sage -dev checkout --ticket 16211
On ticket #16211 with associated local branch "ticket/16211".
# Use "sage --dev merge" to include anoth
I get a whole bunch of edits, nothing relevant to the changes made by this
ticket... :-(
Probably master is not the right thing? I tried develop too...
-Kannappan.
On Apr 23, 2014, at 7:33 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/gIet3_kQNzo for what
>
See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/gIet3_kQNzo for
what to do - e.g. sage -dev diff --base master might work.
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:02:25 PM UTC-4, KnS wrote:
>
> Hello group,
>
> I am trying to review the ticket 16091. I did
>
> sage -dev checkout --ticket 16091
>
On Dec 14, 2006, at 17:53 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:46:48 -0800, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Has the name changed while I wasn't looking, or are things just
>> really quiet on the IRC airwaves?
>
> I think everybody is taking a break after all th
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:46:48 -0800, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Has the name changed while I wasn't looking, or are things just
> really quiet on the IRC airwaves?
I think everybody is taking a break after all the work getting sage-1.5
ready;
also, at UW, this is finals w
Works like a charm. Great!!!
Bill.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-dev
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:49:34 -0700, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>(1) It has the new polynomial variable name injection code:
>> sage: MPolynomialRing(QQ,'x',10)
>
> Works fine, but:
>
> sage: R=ZZ['x,y,z']
>
> causes an exception.
>
> Traceb
William Stein wrote:
>(1) It has the new polynomial variable name injection code:
> sage: MPolynomialRing(QQ,'x',10)
Works fine, but:
sage: R=ZZ['x,y,z']
causes an exception.
Traceback (most recent call
last)
/home/wbhart/ in ()
/home/wbhart/ring.pyx in ring.Ring.__getitem
17 matches
Mail list logo
