[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-19 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 19, 12:57 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/18 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Jun 18, 1:02 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > >> OK, you were right: atlas took 115m37s, i.e. about 2hrs . > > > That is pretty much what I suspec

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-19 Thread John Cremona
2008/6/18 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jun 18, 1:02 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi John, > >> OK, you were right: atlas took 115m37s, i.e. about 2hrs . > > That is pretty much what I suspected. Anything I can do to speed this up in future? Otherwise I'll be less inc

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-18 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 18, 1:02 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi John, > OK, you were right: atlas took 115m37s, i.e. about 2hrs . That is pretty much what I suspected. > When you say cache size, do you mean on the machine?  The laptop has > 2GB ram -- was supposed to have 4 but they forgot to

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-18 Thread John Cremona
OK, you were right: atlas took 115m37s, i.e. about 2hrs . When you say cache size, do you mean on the machine? The laptop has 2GB ram -- was supposed to have 4 but they forgot to install it and I am expecting a guy to come by in the next couple of days to install the extra. But maybe that is no

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-17 Thread mhampton
All tests passed for me on two Intel macs, running os x 10.4 and 10.5. -M. Hampton On Jun 17, 11:53 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 17, 9:22 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Built 3.0.3.rc0 on here: > > Hi John, > > > Linux version 2.6.24-18-generic ([EMAIL PR

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-17 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 17, 9:22 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Built 3.0.3.rc0 on here: Hi John, > Linux version 2.6.24-18-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3 > (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed May 28 20:27:26 UTC 2008 > > and here: > > Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-17 Thread mabshoff
On Jun 16, 9:31 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am almost ok with releasing rc0.   I saw only one problem with any > doctests (I > did not finish doctesting yet on itanium linux). > > There is *one* problem on our debian64 virtual machine on bsd.  I guess you > saw thi

[sage-devel] Re: sage-3.0.3.rc0

2008-06-17 Thread John Cremona
Built 3.0.3.rc0 on here: Linux version 2.6.24-18-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed May 28 20:27:26 UTC 2008 and here: Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.3.rc0 released

2008-06-17 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > this is hopefully the final step toward 3.0.3. The release is much > later than I had hoped, but it should be a solid one. There are a > massive number of positively reviewed tickets in trac and many things > are going on that will be done at Dev1, but those wil