On Jan 23, 12:09 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
> >> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
>
> > It'
On Jan 22, 2008, at 1:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
>> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
>
> It's a mistake. It's actually not in the current sage-2.10.tar
> tarball in the to
On Jan 22, 2008 10:20 AM, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a good reason why the file 'sage-2.9.1.txt'
> is at the top-level of sage-2.10?=
It's a mistake. It's actually not in the current sage-2.10.tar
tarball in the top level if you just extract it. I wonder how it
gets put in th
