[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-23 Thread William Stein
On 4/23/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll have to think about it. It's a somewhat tricky problem, > > possibly involving > > threads or improving the cleaner process. > > I think it might be handy to have some kind of a timeout parameter on > the cleanup processes (though I'

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-23 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Apr 23, 2007, at 7:32 AM, William Stein wrote: > On 4/23/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > dortmund.de> wrote: >> Ok, you can find a copy at http://fsmath.mathematik.uni- >> dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/ >> - it is PPC only at the moment. >> >>> Sounds good - I am trying to figure out if

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-23 Thread William Stein
On 4/23/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, you can find a copy at > http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/ > - it is PPC only at the moment. > > > > > > Sounds good - I am trying to figure out if there is a way that the > > > notebook can tell the server to terminate

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-23 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 23, 4:29 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The compressed dmg is ~137MB, I will post a link once I am at the > > office. > > That's reasonable. Ok, you can find a copy at http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/ - it is PPC only at the moment. > > > S

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-22 Thread William Stein
On 4/22/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One exists to please ;) - and working on this kind of stuff is always > fun. It's 2:15 am local time a the moment and I should go to bed to > catch some sleep, but once I get going ... > > > > and you are done. I can upload a dmg once I will be in

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-22 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 23, 1:33 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/22/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > William did mention a while ago that he is interested in a native > > MacOSX application. I played around a couple hours and I now have > > somewhat of a prototype. > > AWESOME!

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 2.4.2 Mac.app prototype

2007-04-22 Thread William Stein
On 4/22/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William did mention a while ago that he is interested in a native > MacOSX application. I played around a couple hours and I now have > somewhat of a prototype. > AWESOME! Many many many thanks! > To build > > - get > http://fsmath.mathematik.u

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-16 Thread William Stein
On 4/15/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 14, 1:42 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > If you get libgd working, > > > > > I did post a patch earlier. Should I submit it formally? > > > > Could you just mak

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-15 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 14, 1:42 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If you get libgd working, > > > I did post a patch earlier. Should I submit it formally? > > Could you just make a new version of the gdmodule spkg and > make that available t

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2: multiline paste issue

2007-04-14 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 14, 6:51 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/14/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > when I paste the following command into SAGE > > > for i in range(1,3): > >print(str(i)) > > print("SAGE will never get here") > > You have to put a blank l

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2 on cygwin -testall failures

2007-04-14 Thread William Stein
> I initially just intended to build an MSI installer of 2.4.2 (or 2.5 > by the time I am done;), but now it seems to be becoming somewhat more > of a project. William did also try to build on cygwin, but as far as I > can tell he didn't update the binary release in sage.math yet, so I > assume he

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2 on cygwin -testall failures

2007-04-14 Thread William Stein
Hi everyone, I know exactly what is going wrong with the maxima interface on Windows. You shouldn't worry about it further -- I'm on it. Bobby Moretti and I were working on rewriting the maxima interface to make it far more robust, and in so doing this should fix the windows issue too. On 4/14

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2: multiline paste issue

2007-04-14 Thread William Stein
On 4/14/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > when I paste the following command into SAGE > > for i in range(1,3): >print(str(i)) > print("SAGE will never get here") You have to put a blank line after the second print statement: for i in range(1,3): print(str(i)) print

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2 on cygwin -testall failures

2007-04-14 Thread mabshoff
Ok, an short update: - Maxima passes all test when building on cygwin with the sources used by sage. - in interfaces/maxima.py cygwin is treated differently when parsing of the result from Maxima compared to everybody else. There are two places in the code that do things differently depending on

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2 on cygwin -testall failures

2007-04-14 Thread mabshoff
Hello David, On Apr 14, 4:14 pm, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It appears you have failures in functions.py, combinat.py, and piecewise.py. > > Except maybe for some stuff at the bottom of the file, I didn't write > functions.py. The AUTHOR info etc in the top docstring is missing. >

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE 2.4.2 on cygwin -testall failures

2007-04-14 Thread David Joyner
It appears you have failures in functions.py, combinat.py, and piecewise.py. Except maybe for some stuff at the bottom of the file, I didn't write functions.py. The AUTHOR info etc in the top docstring is missing. However, I did write combinat.py and piecewise.py. All I can say is (a) the comman

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread William Stein
On 4/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you get libgd working, > > I did post a patch earlier. Should I submit it formally? Could you just make a new version of the gdmodule spkg and make that available to me? > > I just > > found a problem building real_mpfr.pyx in the SAGE libra

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 13, 8:21 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the work on cygwin. In the past we've packaged up > whatever was needed from a cygwin install, e.g., cygwin1.dll > and a bunch of other things, and it worked OK. > Ok. > If you get libgd working, I di

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread William Stein
Hi Michael, Thanks for the work on cygwin. In the past we've packaged up whatever was needed from a cygwin install, e.g., cygwin1.dll and a bunch of other things, and it worked OK. If you get libgd working, I just found a problem building real_mpfr.pyx in the SAGE library, which you'll run into

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread mabshoff
Reagarding the patch: I just found out the hard way that for gdmodule one has to patch Setup.py.cygwin. Now it actually works if one invokes "make" in SAGE_ROOT: --- Setup.py.cygwin.orig2007-04-13 20:05:02.43750 +0200 +++ Setup.py.cygwin 2007-04-13 20:05:17.31250 +0200 @@ -1,

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread William Stein
On 4/13/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. installation went fine on suse 10.1amd64 Thanks. Please check that when you type version() from in sage, it says 2.4.2. On one of my upgrades the problem with that missing file that was messing up cloning also messes up upgrading. If yo

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread mabshoff
Ok, the problem is not in gdmodule, but libgd ask for symbols that were in libfl and libfontconfig (at least on my box ;) I am not working with hg yet (this is planned for the weekend), so this is just a "classic" diff: 61,72c61,65 < import os < if os.uname()[0][:6] == "CYGWIN": < want_libs

[sage-devel] Re: sage-2.4.2

2007-04-13 Thread mabshoff
On Apr 13, 10:04 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I've released sage-2.4.2. This is just a fairly minimal > bugfix release, though there are number of important optimizations > in it. There are probably about 10-15 patches from people > in my patch inbox that I haven