Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>>> My first thought is that doing the above might be somewhat orthogonal
>>> to pynac, since pynac provides the low-level symbolic manipulation,
>>> and the above would just be a natural thing built on top of that.
>> I
On Feb 22, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> My first thought is that doing the above might be somewhat orthogonal
>> to pynac, since pynac provides the low-level symbolic manipulation,
>> and the above would just be a natural thing built on top of that.
>
> I agree that the above is inde
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:47:50 -0800
William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
> >
> > I was tinkering around trying to get the following to work:
> >
> > f(x,y,z) = vector([x^2,y+z,x*y*z])
> >
> > which defines a 3d vector field, or in general, some function
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> I was tinkering around trying to get the following to work:
>
> f(x,y,z) = vector([x^2,y+z,x*y*z])
>
> which defines a 3d vector field, or in general, some function from SR^n
> to SR^m. However, it seems like extensive changes may be silly
