Thanks!
On Monday, 9 January 2017 11:51:48 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2017-01-09 10:44, Kosta wrote:
> > Sorry for the double post.
> > Is there a guideline for when it is safe to just "make" again after
> > upgrading the version in git
>
> Yes: "make" should always work, with one cav
On 2017-01-09 10:44, Kosta wrote:
Sorry for the double post.
Is there a guideline for when it is safe to just "make" again after
upgrading the version in git
Yes: "make" should always work, with one caveat: the documentation might
not build. So "make doc-clean && make" should always work. If n
Sorry for the double post.
Is there a guideline for when it is safe to just "make" again after
upgrading the version in git, versus "make distclean && make"?
Thanks in advance!
On Monday, 9 January 2017 01:00:34 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le dimanche 8 janvier 2017 23:41:35 UTC+
Thanks! I'll get it.
On Monday, 9 January 2017 01:00:34 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le dimanche 8 janvier 2017 23:41:35 UTC+1, Kosta a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to build 7.5.rc2 on the aforementioned platform. When getting
>> to pynac-0.7.3, I get an error (the first ob
Hi,
Le dimanche 8 janvier 2017 23:41:35 UTC+1, Kosta a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to build 7.5.rc2 on the aforementioned platform. When getting
> to pynac-0.7.3, I get an error (the first observed error during the
> compilation of pynac):
>
>
This error is fixed in 7.5.rc3 (released today
