On 11/30/11 10:45 PM, Eviatar wrote:
It's still down.
It looks like we ran out of disk space on /scratch again. I deleted a
file or two to give us a little breathing room, but we'll probably have
this issue again on boxen again in the future.
I restarted the server and it works now. Plea
It's still down.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Yes, that was it. Not a list, sorry.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sag
On 11/18/11 1:50 AM, Eviatar wrote:
It broke again. I'm pretty sure it's a timeout issue this time, since I
was iterating over a large list.
Was it this command?
while 1:
print 'hi'
I'm looking into it. The infinite loop is indeed stopped, further
calculations are indeed run, and the fu
It broke again. I'm pretty sure it's a timeout issue this time, since I was
iterating over a large list.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this g
On 11/17/11 4:17 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Eviatar wrote:
Ah, okay.
Would there be any load problems if more people used it? I ask because I'm
working on a simple Chromium/Chrome extension for it.
Great work by the way! I think it has a lot of potential.
As own
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> Ah, okay.
> Would there be any load problems if more people used it? I ask because I'm
> working on a simple Chromium/Chrome extension for it.
> Great work by the way! I think it has a lot of potential.
As owner/manager of the computer it runs on,
Ah, okay.
Would there be any load problems if more people used it? I ask because I'm
working on a simple Chromium/Chrome extension for it.
Great work by the way! I think it has a lot of potential.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this g
On 11/17/11 11:53 AM, Eviatar wrote:
Try the server. I think it's still running.
(replying only to sage-devel)
Actually, it looks like the server ran out of disk space (/scratch on
boxen).
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Try the server. I think it's still running.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://
On 11/17/11 1:41 AM, Eviatar wrote:
I'm sorry, I was testing it and tried "while 1: print 'Hello world'". It
seems to still be working on that, and doesn't output anything anymore.
Maybe a timeout is necessary?
There should be a timeout already. Your computation didn't keep running
forever,
I'm sorry, I was testing it and tried "while 1: print 'Hello world'". It
seems to still be working on that, and doesn't output anything anymore.
Maybe a timeout is necessary?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 11/16/11 8:04 PM, Eviatar wrote:
One problem: random doesn't work. It generates the same value every time.
Good point. The worker process is forked from one main server process,
so it inherits the same random seed each time. I suppose it would be
easy enough to reset the random seed. Do
One problem: random doesn't work. It generates the same value every time.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com
On 8/6/11 7:55 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Juanlu001 wrote:
I have tested multiple interacts of mine and some computations, and
everything seems to work quite well except for the backslash \, which
I tried to use to split lines. It gives a syntax error:
SyntaxError
On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Juanlu001 wrote:
> I have tested multiple interacts of mine and some computations, and
> everything seems to work quite well except for the backslash \, which I tried
> to use to split lines. It gives a syntax error:
>
> SyntaxError Tr
Thanks for the reply and advice. Glad to hear this is not
inconceivable. I hope to get at some more experimenting in the next
few days, so will try out a few things then.
Rob
On Aug 5, 11:56 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Yes, this would be very easy to do. In fact, that's pretty much what is
> don
On 8/5/11 2:18 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
I have been experimenting with including the single cell in documents
that are born in authoring formats, specifically LaTeX and Docbook,
with output as webpages or ebooks. I imagine my comments would apply
equally well to ReST, but that is mostly just inform
I have been experimenting with including the single cell in documents
that are born in authoring formats, specifically LaTeX and Docbook,
with output as webpages or ebooks. I imagine my comments would apply
equally well to ReST, but that is mostly just informed speculation.
In this setting, the s
On 8/1/11 11:38 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Aug 1, 10:02 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
I changed the public API (which probably broke your demo).
Still working, it seems. I don't think you changed anything I'm
using.
Ah, that makes sense. Javascript just ignores extra arguments to a
function (so t
On Aug 1, 10:02 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> I changed the public API (which probably broke your demo).
Still working, it seems. I don't think you changed anything I'm
using.
> But it does let you seamlessly embed interacts in webpages
> with just a simple button to make the interact live.
That'
On 8/1/11 7:31 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
OK, demo updated and everything seems to be working as intended now.
http://buzzard.ups.edu/misc/singlecell/singlecell-minimal.html
I changed the public API (which probably broke your demo). Here is a
new example. Note that now it's easy to change the te
OK, demo updated and everything seems to be working as intended now.
http://buzzard.ups.edu/misc/singlecell/singlecell-minimal.html
> Tab completion seems a bit...interesting to do
Right. I guess the most we could hope for would be completion on
global stuff - functional syntax like log() and
On 8/1/11 5:52 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Aug 1, 5:07 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
Ah, I didn't realize you meant that I broke the normal singlecell
because I forgot that I changed things ;). It's working now.
Thanks, Jason, for the quick fixes and ideas.
Working demo at:
http://buzzard.ups.edu/mi
On Aug 1, 5:07 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Ah, I didn't realize you meant that I broke the normal singlecell
> because I forgot that I changed things ;). It's working now.
Thanks, Jason, for the quick fixes and ideas.
Working demo at:
http://buzzard.ups.edu/misc/singlecell/singlecell-minimal.html
On 8/1/11 5:07 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
I should just mention that the above line is for ipad/android tablet
devices. It makes a world of difference in how small the things on the
screen are and how usable everything is on the tablets/iphones. We
should maybe look into using it for the sage
On 8/1/11 4:23 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Aug 1, 8:50 am, Jason Grout wrote:
Can you post your current working/nonworking version so I can test it too?
Thanks, Jason, for all the details. I'll try to put up an example or
two, incorporating what you have suggested.
Right now, it looks like som
On 8/1/11 4:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 8/1/11 4:23 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Aug 1, 8:50 am, Jason Grout wrote:
Can you post your current working/nonworking version so I can test it
too?
Thanks, Jason, for all the details. I'll try to put up an example or
two, incorporating what you have sug
On 8/1/11 4:23 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Aug 1, 8:50 am, Jason Grout wrote:
Can you post your current working/nonworking version so I can test it too?
Thanks, Jason, for all the details. I'll try to put up an example or
two, incorporating what you have suggested.
Right now, it looks like som
On Aug 1, 8:50 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Can you post your current working/nonworking version so I can test it too?
Thanks, Jason, for all the details. I'll try to put up an example or
two, incorporating what you have suggested.
Right now, it looks like something has changed and is not working f
On 8/1/11 1:30 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 7/31/11 3:05 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
8. Is there a way to "pre-load" the CodeMirror text area? Or more
precisely, what could I place into the HTML that would take some code
and load up the text area with the code as its content? Maybe this
should be an argu
On 7/31/11 3:05 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
8. Is there a way to "pre-load" the CodeMirror text area? Or more
precisely, what could I place into the HTML that would take some code
and load up the text area with the code as its content? Maybe this
should be an argument to the singlecell creation func
On 7/30/11 7:58 PM, Kelvin Li wrote:
Sorry, I broke it again:
@interact
def f(a = input_grid(nrows=1, ncols=2, to_value=lambda t:3)):
pass
(throws an error that looks very similar to the previous one)
I think I've fixed it better now [1]. Can you check it again?
Thanks,
Jason
[1]
On 7/31/11 3:05 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Jul 31, 2:55 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
Some questions and observations.
Knew I was forgetting something.
8. Is there a way to "pre-load" the CodeMirror text area? Or more
precisely, what could I place into the HTML that would take some code
and load up
On 7/31/11 2:55 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Kudos to Jason and the students at Drake. This is very nice.
Thanks! And thanks again for testing!
I've tried to "hide" some of the diagnostic information, and style a
few of the remaining elements. I've done this with my own crude CSS
stylesheet and
On Jul 31, 2:55 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Some questions and observations.
Knew I was forgetting something.
8. Is there a way to "pre-load" the CodeMirror text area? Or more
precisely, what could I place into the HTML that would take some code
and load up the text area with the code as its conte
Kudos to Jason and the students at Drake. This is very nice.
I've tried to "hide" some of the diagnostic information, and style a
few of the remaining elements. I've done this with my own crude CSS
stylesheet and via the arguments to the singlecell creation function.
Some questions and observati
On 7/30/11 10:30 PM, John Travis wrote:
Great. I'm having to look harder for problems so that's good. Check
out the spacing issue on the label rho(x,y,z) for
@interact(layout=dict(top=[['rho','a1']]))
def _(
a1 = input_box(2,label='$a_1$'),
rho=input_box(x,label='$\\rho(x,y,z)$',widt
On 7/30/11 7:58 PM, Kelvin Li wrote:
On Jul 30, 5:25 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
Soon I will make it so that you can just have a non-colored plain text
box, or toggle between the fancy and non-fancy editors.
That would be cool!
For interacts, looks like "input_grid" and "color_selector" widgets
Great. I'm having to look harder for problems so that's good. Check
out the spacing issue on the label rho(x,y,z) for
@interact(layout=dict(top=[['rho','a1']]))
def _(
a1 = input_box(2,label='$a_1$'),
rho=input_box(x,label='$\\rho(x,y,z)$',width=8)):
print "hello"
JT
On Jul 30, 4:0
On Jul 30, 5:25 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Soon I will make it so that you can just have a non-colored plain text
> box, or toggle between the fancy and non-fancy editors.
That would be cool!
> > For interacts, looks like "input_grid" and "color_selector" widgets
> > have problems. To reproduce:
On 7/30/11 12:01 PM, Kelvin Li wrote:
Wow, this is really neat!
Out of laziness/incompetence to do any deeper investigation, I will
list my complaints in no particular order. :-)
The syntax highlighting is really cool, but when there is a lot of
text, scrolling through it with the arrow keys ca
On 7/30/11 7:57 AM, John Travis wrote:
A real minor problem I found was with labels in interact. No latex
for such as
def _( x0 = input_box(0,width=5,label='$x_0$'), blah
This is fixed now; if you have time, please test it.
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-de
Wow, this is really neat!
Out of laziness/incompetence to do any deeper investigation, I will
list my complaints in no particular order. :-)
The syntax highlighting is really cool, but when there is a lot of
text, scrolling through it with the arrow keys can be slow/jerky (at
least in my browser:
On 7/30/11 9:14 AM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to announce a trial beta run of a public single cell server:
http://sagemath.org:5467/
The idea is that this is a single cell that can very easily be embedded in
any webpage.
On 7/30/11 7:57 AM, John Travis wrote:
Awesome.
A real minor problem I found was with labels in interact. No latex
for such as
def _( x0 = input_box(0,width=5,label='$x_0$'), blah
I noticed this when testing one of your interacts yesterday and created
an issue for it:
https://github.com/
Awesome.
A real minor problem I found was with labels in interact. No latex
for such as
def _( x0 = input_box(0,width=5,label='$x_0$'), blah
Also, %hide does not work but it would be nice to have the option when
shelling out from something like WebWork. Indeed, when using
interacts, it might
On 7/30/11 3:25 AM, leif wrote:
On 30 Jul., 10:48, Jason Grout wrote:
On 7/30/11 1:35 AM, John Cremona wrote:
Looks nice! Is it necessary to have the "Computation ID" block so
visible? After a few evaluations I could no longer see the output
without scrolling down.
No, it's not necessary
On 30 Jul., 10:48, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 7/30/11 1:35 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > Looks nice! Is it necessary to have the "Computation ID" block so
> > visible? After a few evaluations I could no longer see the output
> > without scrolling down.
>
> No, it's not necessary; thanks for the su
I have tested multiple interacts of mine and some computations, and
everything seems to work quite well except for the backslash \, which I
tried to use to split lines. It gives a syntax error:
SyntaxError Traceback (most recent call
last)SyntaxError: invalid synta
On 7/30/11 1:35 AM, John Cremona wrote:
Looks nice! Is it necessary to have the "Computation ID" block so
visible? After a few evaluations I could no longer see the output
without scrolling down.
No, it's not necessary; thanks for the suggestion. In fact, when
embedding in a page, you can t
Looks nice! Is it necessary to have the "Computation ID" block so
visible? After a few evaluations I could no longer see the output
without scrolling down.
This looks as if it could be very useful!
John
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 7/29/11 8:15 PM, P Purkayastha wr
On 7/29/11 8:15 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
Hi,
Some computations ran fine. However, the code from
http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact/ didn't. Only the first order is
shown, and moving the slider provides no update.
Thanks. That is fixed now.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sag
Hi,
Some computations ran fine. However, the code from
http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact/ didn't. Only the first order is shown,
and moving the slider provides no update.
basu.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an emai
54 matches
Mail list logo
