On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, mabshoff wrote:
> On Dec 28, 8:36 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Michael,
>
> Hello Francois,
>
> > I think I found my problem. A little googling actually helped with
> > this link:http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6864
> > I did some experiments with the intel
On Dec 28, 8:36 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Michael,
Hello Francois,
> I think I found my problem. A little googling actually helped with
> this link:http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6864
> I did some experiments with the intel _fortran_ compiler (not even the
> C compiler)
>
Hello Michael,
I think I found my problem. A little googling actually helped with
this link:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6864
I did some experiments with the intel _fortran_ compiler (not even the
C compiler)
and I still have it on my system.
Since the intel compiler doesn't compile my lattice
On Dec 28, 9:47 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hello Francois,
> I poked around a bit and the problem is not with pari. The problem
> is the parameter "-no_archive". My version of ld from binutils-2.18
> doesn't
> support such an option. In fact if it did, it should be --
On Dec 28, 9:47 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have trouble compiling sage on my linux box which is as follow:
> x86 (amd athlon - definitely not amd64)
> distro is gentoo up to date as of last week. kernel 2.6.23, glibc
> 2.6.1
> gcc-4.2.2, binutils-2.18.
> The problem
