[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 1:08:20 AM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote: > > We need a port of sagemath to Raspbery Pi OS. > Using https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091, developers can do portability testing on this platform without need for access to an actual raspberry pi. tox -e docker-raspbian-bus

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

Raspberry Pi OS is the new name of raspbian. And indeed raspbian uses apt to deal with packages, but have their own repositories based on debian On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 11:22:30 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Ju

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

No On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 11:22:30 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies > wrote: > > > > > > After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of > sagemath to Raspber

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies wrote: > > > > After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of sagemath > > to Raspbery Pi OS. As far as I see, it is https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/raspberry-pi-desktop

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jaap Spies wrote: > > After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of sagemath to > Raspbery Pi OS. > At least we need a binary of sagemath for Raspberry Pi OS. the binaries are made using https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg Could you try this

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

After this technicalities I reclaim my points: We need a port of sagemath to Raspbery Pi OS. At least we need a binary of sagemath for Raspberry Pi OS. Jaap Spies On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 2:31:52 PM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote: > > Saying Raspberry Pi is saying education. There are zillion Raspb

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:30 PM Isuru Fernando wrote: > > You can track the progress here, > https://github.com/conda-forge/sagelib-feedstock/pull/100 > > Gap and rpy2 are now available. Need to build rw 0.7 now. Is there a reason > for not going to rw 0.8 in sage? I couldn't find a trac ticket

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

You can track the progress here, https://github.com/conda-forge/sagelib-feedstock/pull/100 Gap and rpy2 are now available. Need to build rw 0.7 now. Is there a reason for not going to rw 0.8 in sage? I couldn't find a trac ticket for it. Isuru On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 11:14 AM Dima Pasechnik wrot

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 17:07 Isuru Fernando, wrote: > Hi, > > In conda-forge, we have all the dependencies of sage for aarch64 already > built except for gap and rpy2. > If those two are done, we can build sage the library and you can use > conda-forge to install a binary version of sage. > Any help

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

Hi, In conda-forge, we have all the dependencies of sage for aarch64 already built except for gap and rpy2. If those two are done, we can build sage the library and you can use conda-forge to install a binary version of sage. Any help is appreciated. Isuru On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:09 AM Jaap Spi

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

Done. On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 3:58:20 PM UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 5:31:52 AM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote: >> >> ... Raspberry Pi ... >> > > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091, which adds test infrastructure > for raspbian-buster, still needs review. >

[sage-devel] Re: Porting sagemath to Raspberry Pi OS

On Thursday, July 9, 2020 at 5:31:52 AM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote: > > ... Raspberry Pi ... > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091, which adds test infrastructure for raspbian-buster, still needs review. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-deve

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting .sage files to sage-9.0

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 3:21 PM kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 6:45:50 PM UTC-5, David Roe wrote: >> >> I had a recent discussion asking if there are any good tools for porting >> Sage code to Python 3. Given the recent discussion about how long we >> support Python 2,

[sage-devel] Re: Porting .sage files to sage-9.0

On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 6:45:50 PM UTC-5, David Roe wrote: > > I had a recent discussion asking if there are any good tools for porting > Sage code to Python 3. Given the recent discussion > about > how long we support P

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

Actually, I suppose there is some common overlap, namely in those packages which currently don't build on Windows 64 that don't have a posix layer requirement. Those could be useful ports for both SageMath and for Julia. So there is perhaps still some hope for something. Bill. On Thursday, 8 O

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Thursday, 8 October 2015 12:28:36 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2015-10-08 12:22, Bill Hart wrote: > > Currently, projects like Gap require far too much posix to make it easy > > to build them any other way but with the posix layer, and then it is no > > longer a native application.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On 2015-10-08 12:22, Bill Hart wrote: Currently, projects like Gap require far too much posix to make it easy to build them any other way but with the posix layer, and then it is no longer a native application. There is one thing I don't understand in this whole discussion: what's the problem

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Thursday, 8 October 2015 10:26:06 UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 11:27:25 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote: >> >> OK, after more reading I find that these are the main benefits of MSYS2 >> over Cygwin: >> >> * Support for interop with mingw-w64 built package

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

Hi Bill, On 2015-10-07, Bill Hart wrote: > 4GB of Ram should be enough for anyone. :-) I have it on my laptop, and it is hardly enough to reasonably build the Sage documentation with make -j2... Cheers, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 11:27:25 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote: > > OK, after more reading I find that these are the main benefits of MSYS2 > over Cygwin: > > * Support for interop with mingw-w64 built packages. > * Ability to switch from MSYS to MinGW mode by setting an environment > vari

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

OK, after more reading I find that these are the main benefits of MSYS2 over Cygwin: * Support for interop with mingw-w64 built packages. * Ability to switch from MSYS to MinGW mode by setting an environment variable (MSYSTEM). * Automatic conversion on the fly in the msys2.0.dll between differe

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

Gap built fine for me under MSYS2. There was one warning. (I used MPIR not GMP.) However, I see why Gap built fine. Like Cygwin, MSYS2 sets sizeof(long) to 8. When I earlier said otherwise, I had in fact set up my MSYS2 to use the mingw-w64, and this builds things without the posix layer. Of

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 8:08:30 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 19:54:30 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 07:35:22 UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: >>> >>> HI all, >>> >>> William Stein recently bemoaned the fact that SageMath c

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 19:54:30 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 07:35:22 UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: >> >> HI all, >> >> William Stein recently bemoaned the fact that SageMath currently only >> runs natively on some brands of Linux, and not natively on the lat

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

On Wednesday, 7 October 2015 07:35:22 UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote: > > HI all, > > William Stein recently bemoaned the fact that SageMath currently only runs > natively on some brands of Linux, and not natively on the latest Windows or > OSX (that is to say nothing of BSD). [1] > > Until recently, a

[sage-devel] Re: Porting SageMath to Windows 64

> William Stein recently bemoaned the fact that SageMath currently only runs > natively on some brands of Linux, and not natively on the latest Windows or > OSX (that is to say nothing of BSD). [1] > > Sage works on FreeBSD, or did recently, anyway; I haven't heard anything recently. See

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Thursday, 15 September 2011 05:16:38 UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: >> >> sqrt5.cs should back up now. > > seems to be down again... Thanks for the report. I'm guessing it is some kind of power or dynamic ip issue. I might be able t

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Thursday, 15 September 2011 05:16:38 UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > > sqrt5.cs should back up now. seems to be down again... > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:15, William Stein wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, R. Andrew Ohana > > wrote: > >> I'm not in Seattle currently, so I ca

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

Seems to be down again... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: porting Sage to OS X 10.7

Thanks, I missed the Xcode 4 part. I'll check it out. On Nov 13, 1:34 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, john.hoebing wrote: > > I've reviewed those two tickets and I see some > > discussion about the combo of Lion/Xcode4 but > > I don't see a pointer to either a tar ba

Re: [sage-devel] Re: porting Sage to OS X 10.7

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, john.hoebing wrote: > I've reviewed those two tickets and I see some > discussion about the combo of Lion/Xcode4 but > I don't see a pointer to either a tar ball or patches > to get an alpha 4.8 sage that will (start to) build > on OS 10.7.x. One of John Palmierri

[sage-devel] Re: porting Sage to OS X 10.7

I've reviewed those two tickets and I see some discussion about the combo of Lion/Xcode4 but I don't see a pointer to either a tar ball or patches to get an alpha 4.8 sage that will (start to) build on OS 10.7.x. My build system is a new mac mini with Lion/Xcode4 installed by default, and I'm not

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

sqrt5.cs should back up now. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:15, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, R. Andrew Ohana > wrote: >> I'm not in Seattle currently, so I can't until probably Wednesday. Is there >> anyone else who has access to the hardware? > > No worries. > > Incident

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > I'm not in Seattle currently, so I can't until probably Wednesday. Is there > anyone else who has access to the hardware? No worries. Incidentally, my main laptop is now upgraded to 10.7! > > -- > Andrew > > On Sep 11, 2011 12:21 AM, "W

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

I'm not in Seattle currently, so I can't until probably Wednesday. Is there anyone else who has access to the hardware? -- Andrew On Sep 11, 2011 12:21 AM, "William Stein" wrote: > On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> is sqrt5.cs.washington.edu down? > > > Yes. Andrew, can y

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > is sqrt5.cs.washington.edu down? Yes. Andrew, can you fix it? > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com < sage-dev

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

is sqrt5.cs.washington.edu down? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemat

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Jul 28, 4:33 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:06 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> Hi Sage Developers, > >> To help with porting Sage to OS X 10.7, I bought 10.7, installed it, and > >> setup a public-facing machine

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:06 PM, William Stein wrote: >> Hi Sage Developers, >> To help with porting Sage to OS X 10.7, I bought 10.7, installed it, and >> setup a public-facing machine (actually, the old bsd.math.washington.edu) >> with O

[sage-devel] Re: porting sage to OS X 10.7

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:06 PM, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage Developers, > To help with porting Sage to OS X 10.7, I bought 10.7, installed it, and > setup a public-facing machine (actually, the old bsd.math.washington.edu) > with OS X 10.7 and *XCode 4.1* installed on it.    If you had an acc

[sage-devel] Re: porting

On May 16, 1:50 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael (cc: sage-devel and bcc: some sponsors), Feel free to forward since there is no BCC in Google groups ;) > What's the quick status on: > > * OS X 64-bit porting Cleaning up patches. One crash issue related to libSingular