On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:11 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought I would publicly state my own plans on this front, and some
> recent developments.
>
> Polymake is undergoing some architectural changes that may or may not
> make it more attractive for inclusion in sage. Their d
I thought I would publicly state my own plans on this front, and some
recent developments.
Polymake is undergoing some architectural changes that may or may not
make it more attractive for inclusion in sage. Their developers
estimate the new release as sometime in the summer, maybe as early as
J
The toric package does seem relevant, but it is unclear to me exactly
where it overlaps the functionality of cddlib, PALP, and polymake and
where it provides complementary functions. Also, in the areas where
it overlaps it would be interesting to know how it compares in speed.
Are there any bench
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the brave of heart, I have my current effort up on trac as ticket
> #2716.
>
> I hope to add a number of other things and make the polyhedral classes
> more intelligent. Again, I would appreciate any thoughts on how
For the brave of heart, I have my current effort up on trac as ticket
#2716.
I hope to add a number of other things and make the polyhedral classes
more intelligent. Again, I would appreciate any thoughts on how
polyhedral objects in Sage should be organized.
-M. Hampton
On Mar 29, 7:28 am, mh
I guess my plan for the moment is to work inside sage/geometry/
polytope, and mostly imitate the structure of the polymake interface
using only cddlib. About 90% of the functionality of polymake should
be quite easy redo.
-M. Hampton
On Mar 28, 6:46 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
