Hello,
> Can you post a link to the spkg. I've installed Sun Studio 12 update 1
> on my machine at home, which installs the Sun compilers in a different
> directory to on 't2'. For some reason Sun changed the default from
> /opt/SWUNspro which they have used for years, to /opt/sunstudio12.1
her
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Hello,
>> In order to obey this, the following lines should be added to
>> patch/custom.py:
> ok, that seems to fix it indeed. I've attached to corresponding
> custom.py to the trac ticket.
>
> Regards,
> Alexander
Can you post a link to the spkg. I've installed Sun S
Hello,
> In order to obey this, the following lines should be added to
> patch/custom.py:
ok, that seems to fix it indeed. I've attached to corresponding
custom.py to the trac ticket.
Regards,
Alexander
--
Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Math. Alexander Dreyer
Abteilung "Systemanalyse, Prognose und Regel
Hello Dave, hello Martin,
unfortunately, I didn't find the time to have a look at that the issue,
but
> The Sage install makefile defines CXX to be g++ so no code should ignore that.
In order to obey this, the following lines should be added to
patch/custom.py:
---
try:
CC = os.environ['CC'
2009/8/18 Minh Nguyen :
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Alexander
> Dreyer wrote:
>>
>> Hello Martin, hello Dave,
>>
>>> Alright, thanks for checking this. I've CCed Alexander so he can tell me
>>> what
>>> he did back then and I can do it too
>> as far as I can see it fro
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Alexander
Dreyer wrote:
>
> Hello Martin, hello Dave,
>
>> Alright, thanks for checking this. I've CCed Alexander so he can tell me what
>> he did back then and I can do it too
> as far as I can see it from the package, the patch is included. So
> m
Hello Martin, hello Dave,
> Alright, thanks for checking this. I've CCed Alexander so he can tell me what
> he did back then and I can do it too
as far as I can see it from the package, the patch is included. So
maybe, my fix fails for some reason. Is there somewhere on t2 an
experimental Solaris
> I've marked
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6177
>
> that as '[with patch; needs work]' as it breaks on Solaris. There were
> previous issues on Solaris with PolyBoRi which were resolved. With the
> updated .spkg, those issues return. Basically if the Sun C++ compiler
> (CC) can be
> Are
> polybori-0-6-3.4.patch
> polybori-0-6-3.5.patch
>
> included in that spkg file? The patches were added after the link to the
> .spkg file was posted.
These are revisions of the same patch. These are patches against the main Sage
tree and thus not included in the SPKG.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6177
>
> but is there a .spkg file to test it with?
The ticket says:
"The SPKG is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/spkgs/polybori-0.6.spkg";
>>> Yes, but that link was posted 3 months a
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Saturday 15 August 2009, William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David
>>
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>
>
On Saturday 15 August 2009, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David
>
> Kirkby wrote:
> > William Stein wrote:
> >> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
> >>
> >> Kirkby wrote:
> >>> William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Sage-4.1.1 was just releas
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-devel,
Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
patches. Spend a few
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>>
>>> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
>>> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>>>
>>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>
>> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
>> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
>>
>> and revi
William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
>
> and review 1 ticket.
>
> -- William
>
>
>
I'd take a look at
http://
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sage-devel,
>>
>> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
>> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sag
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Sage-4.1.1 was just released, so now is a perfect time to review a few
> patches. Spend a few minutes soon, skim through
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/14
>
> and review 1 ticket.
I gave http://trac.s
18 matches
Mail list logo
