On May 20, 10:00 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mark V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - shipping MPI itself (a dependency) would significantly complicate
> > Sage so use of MPI packages is currently optional.
>
> True. Also there has been no dem
Hi Brian,
Thanks for reading and responding to my comments.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IPython1 is a Python library that Sage ships that builds on MPI.
>> Maybe Fernando or Brian (who I've just cc'd) can comment.
>> We also build on Twisted, which
> IPython1 is a Python library that Sage ships that builds on MPI.
> Maybe Fernando or Brian (who I've just cc'd) can comment.
> We also build on Twisted, which is somewhat relevant for
> certain types of problems..
A few comments along these lines:
- mpi these days is actually really easy to bu
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mark V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I suppose the issues below could be described as related to the question:
> Is SAGE being written as a desktop application, or being written as a
> grid/cloud application?
Sage should be both.
> From what I've gle
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Mark V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi William,
> Thanks for taking time to respond so promptly.
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:17 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:57 PM, MarkV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Q1) Is the focus
Hi William,
Thanks for taking time to respond so promptly.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:17 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:57 PM, MarkV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Q1) Is the focus on performing symbolic calculations in parallel, or
>> are numerically orien
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:57 PM, MarkV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q1) Is the focus on performing symbolic calculations in parallel, or
> are numerically oriented calculations currently being considered?
Both are equally important and relevant to Sage.
>> Yes. But this won't happen on a grand
Hi Devs,
Firstly thanks for making the effort to get SAGE this far.
At the moment I'm a MMA user tracking its progress, and have some
'user-level' questions about SAGE's development, specifically related
to parallel calculations. I'll also indulge in some observations that
may be a little off-top
> > Here are some questions that I would love to see answered:
> > * OpenMP vs MPI: which one would be better for SAGE and why?
> > * Is there a clear winner in the python world for parallel
> > applications? googling for either "open mp python" or "mpi python"
> > shows several modules.
mpi4py h
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 19:47, Yi Qiang wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Joshua Kantor wrote:
> > I assume that yi will talk about distributed
> > sage
>
> Yes I plan on giving a talk. Hopefully there are still time slots
> available either on Saturday or Sunday, does anyone know wher
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Yi Qiang wrote:
> Yes I plan on giving a talk. Hopefully there are still time slots
> available either on Saturday or Sunday, does anyone know where to
> sign up for presentation time? I did not find anything in the wiki.
Yi, your talk has been slotted over the weekend. You
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Joshua Kantor wrote:
> I assume that yi will talk about distributed
> sage
Yes I plan on giving a talk. Hopefully there are still time slots
available either on Saturday or Sunday, does anyone know where to
sign up for presentation time? I did not find anythin
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:07:32 -0700, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/2/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> It would be good if someone who was at the parallel computing workshop
>> could volunteer to give a talk about parallelism issues at SAGE
On 2/2/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> It would be good if someone who was at the parallel computing workshop
> could volunteer to give a talk about parallelism issues at SAGE Days 3,
> as they might relate to SAGE. I'm sure some of the other SAGE
> developers woul
Hi,
I had a great time at the MSRI workshop last week. We were able to
get lots of stuff done on IPython and it was great meeting and talking
with all the SAGE folks. Thanks for including us in the meeting!
I should mention that I will be giving two talks about IPython at
PyCon in late Feb. W
I was planning on talking and hadn't decided what I was talking about.
I would be willing to do this unless
somewhat else wants to. I assume that yi will talk about distributed
sage so I would mostly focus on
chainsaw and threading issues.
Jos
On Feb 2, 2:36 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 02 February 2007 14:36, David Harvey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It would be good if someone who was at the parallel computing workshop
> could volunteer to give a talk about parallelism issues at SAGE Days 3,
> as they might relate to SAGE. I'm sure some of the other SAGE
> developers wou
17 matches
Mail list logo
