Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-12 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Dear Erik, > > Le vendredi 9 novembre 2018 17:56:58 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : >> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:38 PM Emmanuel Charpentier >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > Le vendredi 9 novembre 2018 13:40:12 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-11 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Dear Erik, Le vendredi 9 novembre 2018 17:56:58 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:38 PM Emmanuel Charpentier > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le vendredi 9 novembre 2018 13:40:12 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : > >> > >> Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:38 PM Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > > > Le vendredi 9 novembre 2018 13:40:12 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : >> >> Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by the system >> on macOS, and/or why those libs can't be used for building Python's >> ssl module? > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, November 9, 2018 at 1:50:45 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Apple switched to their own SSL implementation. > They were shipping OpenSSL's headers in some obscure places, shifting > from one release to another, > in their Xcode, for porting purposes. Not sure whether they are st

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le vendredi 9 novembre 2018 13:40:12 UTC+1, Erik Bray a écrit : > > Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by the system > on macOS, and/or why those libs can't be used for building Python's > ssl module? > >From the current installation guide : = Begin q

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:14 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:01 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:50 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:40 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > > > > > > > Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:01 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:50 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:40 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > > > > > Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by the system > > > on macOS, and/or why those libs can't be used

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:50 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:40 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > > > Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by the system > > on macOS, and/or why those libs can't be used for building Python's > > ssl module? > > > > Apple switched to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 7:40 AM Erik Bray wrote: > > Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by the system > on macOS, and/or why those libs can't be used for building Python's > ssl module? > Apple switched to their own SSL implementation. They were shipping OpenSSL's headers in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Erik Bray
Can someone remind me again why SSL libs aren't provided by the system on macOS, and/or why those libs can't be used for building Python's ssl module? Surely the Python community at large has some experience with this but I don't really know what that experience constitutes... On Fri, Nov 9, 2018

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
The license has not been updated yet in their git repo: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/LICENSE I also downloaded the latest release (1.1.1) and it still contains the bad BSD license. So it seems that the license change is not official yet... -- You received this message becau

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Thierry
Hi, On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:02:33AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > I once again got bitten yesterday by installations of Sage without SSL > support. And thus no pip. Which made me check on Openssl's web page > which now states that "OpenSSL is licensed under an Apache-style > license". >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-11-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
I once again got bitten yesterday by installations of Sage without SSL support. And thus no pip. Which made me check on Openssl's web page which now states that "OpenSSL is licensed under an Apache-style license". If this can help Sage having systematic support for SSL (e.g. through openssl as s

[sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-03-31 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Due notice taken. That would simplify Trac#24107 (which is currently dormant, due to the undergoing changes in the configutation system) enormously. -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le samedi 31 mars 2018 14:06:11 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit : > > https://www.ope

[sage-devel] Re: openssl licensing

2018-03-31 Thread Volker Braun
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/03/01/last-license/ They want to change the license in the next release, which is currently in Alpha, and tentatively set for May. On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 11:44:58 AM UTC+2, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > Hi, > > not sure whether ther