On Jun 19, 12:23 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 19 June 2010 03:55, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 5:38 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John H Palmieri
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it.
>
> > Okay, see
On 19 June 2010 03:55, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Jun 18, 5:38 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it.
>
> Okay, see
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9270
>
> for do
On Jun 18, 5:38 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
> > Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it.
Okay, see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9270
for documentation. I hope I have it right. See
http://trac.sag
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it.
I could only find mention of it here:
$ ./sage -advanced
...
-t [-verbose] [-long] [-optional] [-only-optional=list,of,tags]
-- test examples in .py, .pyx, .sa
On Jun 18, 3:21 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> Learning about the sage -t -only-optional argument, I'm noticing that
> there are quite a few modules which don't use the proper syntax.
Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it. (I might
even suggest that if it's not documented, it is
On Jun 18, 3:21 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> Right now I'm fixing this in the graphs directory...
See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9269
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@goo
