On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:34 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2009-Oct-31 19:58:21 -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>through. Let me know if you know something better than google groups.
>>
>> Why not host the mailing list "in house"? We have a
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Oct-31 19:58:21 -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>through. Let me know if you know something better than google groups.
>
> Why not host the mailing list "in house"? We have a domain name and
> access to decent infrastructure. IMHO, a s
On 2009-Oct-31 19:58:21 -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>through. Let me know if you know something better than google groups.
Why not host the mailing list "in house"? We have a domain name and
access to decent infrastructure. IMHO, a set of mailing lists in the
form sage-x...@sagemath.org looks g
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Just in case you're wondering why spam mails got through occasionally,
> here are some stories that present the moderator's side:
>
> http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Google_Groups_Fail%3A_JQuery_Dumps_Google_Over_Spam__Interface_
On 30-Oct-09, at 3:09 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Just in case you're wondering why spam mails got through occasionally,
> here are some stories that present the moderator's side:
As a frequent denigrator of Google Groups, I read these, followed some
links, and found a potential
Thanks for posting these. Very interesting, IMHO.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Just in case you're wondering why spam mails got through occasionally,
> here are some stories that present the moderator's side:
>
> http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/Google_Group
