On 19 Aug, 16:41, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hence, deleting unneeded portions helps the reader.
>
> Strong +1. This list is particularly bad for quoting an entire
> message, 5 levels deep, only to add "I agree" at the very end.
>
> Nick
Make that another. It is crazy some
On 20/08/2008, at 1:41 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> Hence, deleting unneeded portions helps the reader.
>
> Strong +1. This list is particularly bad for quoting an entire
> message, 5 levels deep, only to add "I agree" at the very end.
I don't feel strongly about it. But I am much more lik
Dear Simon,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And now imagine an answer to an answer to an answer. It would be quite
> time consuming to find out which tiny part of a long text with nested
> comments is relevant for the answer.
>
> Hence, deleting unneeded
> Hence, deleting unneeded portions helps the reader.
Strong +1. This list is particularly bad for quoting an entire
message, 5 levels deep, only to add "I agree" at the very end.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googl
Dear Ondrej,
On Aug 19, 12:08 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed by accident in some other thread that some people don't like
> when I quote the whole emails. So I wanted to ask
> if it really causes such big problems. Modern mail readers like gmail
> handle this just fine
