[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-25 Thread Simon King
Hi Michael! On Feb 25, 12:17 pm, Michael Brickenstein wrote: > In my slimgb test files, usually I do the following: > - normalize the leading coefficient to 1 > - consider only the leading terms > - sort the list > If the algorithm gives back not necessarily a reduced GB, but a > minimal GB, we

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-25 Thread Michael Brickenstein
Hi! It's true, that redSB might have some influence on the code run inside Singular. In my slimgb test files, usually I do the following: - normalize the leading coefficient to 1 - consider only the leading terms - sort the list If the algorithm gives back not necessarily a reduced GB, but a minim

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-23 Thread Simon King
Hi Martin, On Feb 23, 4:08 pm, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > Wouldn't it make sense to use option(redSB) for the doc tests, since > > otherwise the result is mathematically not well defined? > > I disagree. The result is well defined, its just not necessarily precise :) > > Also, we are testing th

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-23 Thread Martin Albrecht
> Wouldn't it make sense to use option(redSB) for the doc tests, since > otherwise the result is mathematically not well defined? I disagree. The result is well defined, its just not necessarily precise :) Also, we are testing the behaviour of the groebner() function in that doctest and thus I

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-23 Thread Simon King
PS: On Feb 23, 3:55 pm, Simon King wrote: > Interestingly, groebner() in Singular-3-1-0-Beta yields a result that > differs from both slimgb and std. According to option(prot), this is since groebner() now uses hilbert driven std on this example. Cheers, Simon --~--~-~--~~--

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-23 Thread Simon King
Hi Martin, On Feb 23, 2:41 pm, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Simon, can you trace the commands that go in and out of Singular for this? I > think you can set some logfile attribute for the Singular pexpect interface. Yes, actually it results in two log-files. Both are at http://sage.math.washington.

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-23 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 23, 5:41 am, Martin Albrecht wrote: > Simon reported this doctest failure with his custom Singular 3-1-0 and > sage-3.3: Hi, > > > File > > > "/home/king/SAGE/devel/sage-3.2.3/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/singular.py" > > >, line 116: > > >     sage: I2 > > > Expected: > > >     x1^2*x2^

[sage-devel] Re: make check mit Singular-3-1-0 und sage-3.3

2009-02-23 Thread Martin Albrecht
Simon reported this doctest failure with his custom Singular 3-1-0 and sage-3.3: > > File > > "/home/king/SAGE/devel/sage-3.2.3/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/singular.py" > >, line 116: > > sage: I2 > > Expected: > > x1^2*x2^2, > > x0*x2^3-x1^2*x2^2+x1*x2^3, > > x0*x1-x0*x2-x1*x2, >