I think the extra links "Try Sage online!" and "Try it online!" look
a bit weird. Maybe it would be better if they were somehow part of
the main menu thing in the middle of the screen.
On the downloads page, there is a space missing before "additional
instructions".
david
On Jun 9, 2008,
there is no link to "Standard and Optional Packages"
http://www.sagemath.org/packages.html
Iztok
On Jun 9, 6:25 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So we're going to switch lite.sagemath.org to be the official
> sage website soon. Could you take a quick glance at it
> and s
Why are sage developers missing from
http://lite.sagemath.org/development-ack.html ? Oh I see.. they're on
the dev map. Could there be an explicit link to this page from
http://lite.sagemath.org/development-ack.html ?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> H
On Jun 9, 6:51 pm, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On pagehttp://lite.sagemath.org/development.htmlat the bottom it
> looks to me as if the meter diagram is saying that the quality of Sage
> is 51.5%. ...
This section is something that must be exapanded in the near future -
e.g. I wan
Horribly wrong: each page's title seems to be the same because the
part that is on each one is so long, Sage Open Source Mathematics
Software. Please, pretty please put the name of the page first or
shorten the Sage Open ... blah part to say Sage. I have 5 tabs open
right now and I'm not sure what
On Jun 9, 6:42 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I should comment out the mirror thing until it is populated
everywhere. Then add only those which work!
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to th
On 9-Jun-08, at 9:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So we're going to switch lite.sagemath.org to be the official
> sage website soon. Could you take a quick glance at it
> and see if there is anything that is *horribly totally wrong*
> in your humble opinion.
Do broken links count? From
On page http://lite.sagemath.org/development.html at the bottom it
looks to me as if the meter diagram is saying that the quality of Sage
is 51.5%. I know that this page is "for developers" but if more
casual enquirers look here they might get the impression that only
51.5% of the code is tested.
On Jun 9, 9:42 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
> I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
> 10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
>
Hi,
I think this is a definite issue since
Has anyone yet tested to see how well the new site mirrors?
I haven't looked at the source html but just just ask since I think
10 or so non-functioning mirrors would be a bad thing.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So we're going to switch li
10 matches
Mail list logo
