ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Hello all
>
> The latex representation of numbers in scientific notation works as
> excepted, unless we have these numbers as results from numerical
> integral. Compare the last two outputs i nthe session below. Why is
>
> sage: latex(A[1])
> 1.66533453694e-14
>
> and
Hold up, this is already IN trac and Jason Grout submitted a patch
which already has positive review!
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-u
On 30 říj, 08:49, William Stein wrote:
>
> There is a table in there called latex_table. You have to
> add an entry of the form
>
>float:float_function
>
> where you might first try something like this just to get it to work:
>
> def float_function(x):
> from sage.rings.all import RR
>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
>
>
> On 30 říj, 08:32, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Obviously, it would be nice if the latex command were improved so it
>> is aware of Python floats. That would be a nice enhancement you
>> can contribute to sage.
>
> Thank you for qui
On Oct 30, 2009, at 12:43 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> On 30 říj, 08:32, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Obviously, it would be nice if the latex command were improved so it
>> is aware of Python floats. That would be a nice enhancement you
>> can contribute to sage.
>
> Thank you for quick answer.
On 30 říj, 08:32, William Stein wrote:
>
> Obviously, it would be nice if the latex command were improved so it
> is aware of Python floats. That would be a nice enhancement you
> can contribute to sage.
Thank you for quick answer. Can you give me few pointers where to fix
it?
Robert
>
> -
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:23 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> The latex representation of numbers in scientific notation works as
> excepted, unless we have these numbers as results from numerical
> integral. Compare the last two outputs i nthe session below. Why is
>
> sage: latex(
