[sage-devel] Re: latest R spkg

2007-12-12 Thread William Stein
On Dec 10, 2007 4:04 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The package installed fine on my intel OS X (10.4) machine, but I > haven't gotten the graphics to work on either of my platforms. When > you say, > > (2) If you X devel headers installed, it *will* build graphics > support in. >

[sage-devel] Re: latest R spkg

2007-12-10 Thread mhampton
The package installed fine on my intel OS X (10.4) machine, but I haven't gotten the graphics to work on either of my platforms. When you say, (2) If you X devel headers installed, it *will* build graphics support in. do just mean installing X11 for OS X from the installation CD? Or is there

[sage-devel] Re: latest R spkg

2007-12-10 Thread John Cremona
It worked fine for me (ubuntu 7.10, gcc-4.2): real4m41.972s user3m32.781s sys 0m49.423s Successfully installed r-2.6.1.p3 John On 09/12/2007, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Josh Kantor and I made a new R spkg here: > > http://sagemath.org/packages/optional

[sage-devel] Re: latest R spkg

2007-12-09 Thread William Stein
On Dec 9, 2007 8:50 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fantastic - that worked for me on my ppc apple laptop. I will try it > tomorrow on my intel mac, and linux if I have a chance. > > This has a lot of potential to increase sage's profile in industry as > well as academia. R will be i

[sage-devel] Re: latest R spkg

2007-12-09 Thread mhampton
Fantastic - that worked for me on my ppc apple laptop. I will try it tomorrow on my intel mac, and linux if I have a chance. This has a lot of potential to increase sage's profile in industry as well as academia. I continue to be extremely impressed by the progress sage is making; I think all t