On Feb 22, 2:10 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 09:44PM -0500, D. S. McNeil wrote:
> > > I think it's very appropriate to open a ticket for this. It would be
> > > even more appropriate to try to construct a more minimal
> > > counterexample :) but at least then we have it on the
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 09:44PM -0500, D. S. McNeil wrote:
> > I think it's very appropriate to open a ticket for this. It would be
> > even more appropriate to try to construct a more minimal
> > counterexample :) but at least then we have it on the record.
>
> So far the best I can do is
>
> f(
On Feb 21, 9:44 pm, "D. S. McNeil" wrote:
> > I think it's very appropriate to open a ticket for this. It would be
> > even more appropriate to try to construct a more minimal
> > counterexample :) but at least then we have it on the record.
>
> So far the best I can do is
>
> f(t) = e^(-(4.007
> I think it's very appropriate to open a ticket for this. It would be
> even more appropriate to try to construct a more minimal
> counterexample :) but at least then we have it on the record.
So far the best I can do is
f(t) = e^(-(4.007 - 3*I)*t)
integral(f, (t, 0, infinity))
*boom*
and not
On Feb 21, 8:38 pm, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> I didn't actually expect the following to work very well, but I definitely
> did not expect the output that I did get:
>
> sage: def IC9E(K, j, a, b, epsilon):
> : g(t) = 2*pi*i * (a - i*a + 2*b*K + i*2*b*K)*(1+i)*t - (1+i)^2 *
> 2*i*b*t^2
> ..