Hey,
I wouldn't wrap if you can/want to use it as another type matrix (in
particular, being able to use its superclass' methods without having to
unwrap it, worry about coercion, write functions which simply pass to the
wrapped element, etc.). IMO wrapping is good when you want to interact wi
On 6/6/13 11:00 PM, David Roe wrote:
You can't inherit from both dense and sparse, but you can probably
create a PoolingMatrix class that doesn't inherit from either then a
PoolingMatrix_dense and PoolingMatrix_sparse that inherit from both the
relevant matrix class and your generic PoolingMatrix
Travis, thanks for the response (still wrapping my head around it).
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 7:34:35 AM UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hey Rob,
> Here's a patch where I made CartanMatrix inherit from regular
> matrices: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14137. Although it is
>
I should also say, you probably do not need the metaclass since you don't
need to do extra processing of the inputs (actually I probably don't need
it either...)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Hey Rob,
Here's a patch where I made CartanMatrix inherit from regular matrices:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14137. Although it is slightly
bad as there is not a proper parent, but here's the short version:
__metaclass__ = ClasscallMetaclass
@staticmethod
def __cla
