On Wednesday 26 March 2008 15:16, Craig Citro wrote:
> Did we check in a big chunk of the ntl wrapper under your name? (That
> one would be fair, of course). Or maybe when we moved libcsage into
> the sage tree, that went in under your name?
I suspect that both of these things are a big contribut
Did we check in a big chunk of the ntl wrapper under your name? (That
one would be fair, of course). Or maybe when we moved libcsage into
the sage tree, that went in under your name?
-cc
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 26 March 2008 1
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 26 March 2008 13:55, Jason Grout wrote:
> > Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
> > "churn" command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
> > code p
On Wednesday 26 March 2008 13:55, Jason Grout wrote:
> Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
> "churn" command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
> code per person (well, per email address). I thought the output (see
> below) was interesting.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mercurial 1.0 is out now and one of the new standard extensions is the
> "churn" command, which apparently gives the numbers of lines of changed
> code per person (well, per email address). I thought the output (see
>
