> > That sounds exiting, are there also plans to implement "discrete"
> > fractals? (combinat.WordMorphisms and word-paths and things like
> > that?)
>
> >http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/combinat/words/paths.html
> >http://alexis.monnerot-dumaine.neuf.fr/articles/fibonacci%20fractal.pdf
> > That sounds exiting, are there also plans to implement "discrete"
> > fractals? (combinat.WordMorphisms and word-paths and things like
> > that?)
>
> >http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/combinat/words/paths.html
> >http://alexis.monnerot-dumaine.neuf.fr/articles/fibonacci%20fractal.pdf
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Mar 2, 8:15 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> A student of mine is going to add to sage the capability of plotting
>> lots and lots of fractals easily.
>
> That sounds exiting, are there also plans to implement "discrete"
> fractals? (combinat.
On Mar 2, 8:15 pm, William Stein wrote:
> A student of mine is going to add to sage the capability of plotting
> lots and lots of fractals easily.
That sounds exiting, are there also plans to implement "discrete"
fractals? (combinat.WordMorphisms and word-paths and things like
that?)
http://www.
Cool, I will try to contribute to this. It might be summertime before
I do much, although I couldn't resist adding a little to the ticket
already.
-Marshall
On Mar 2, 1:15 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A student of mine is going to add to sage the capability of plotting
> lots and lots of
