Hi
On 22.07.2014 14:47, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
My point of view is "let's make one step at a time" or we'll just never
include anything in Sage.
So I think the little wrapper you submitted is a good inclusion.
For sure we should also implement all that Fredrik and you suggested,
but let's alre
On 22.07.2014 14:42, Fredrik Johansson wrote:> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at
> The reversion of t - t^3 + O(t^5) to length n = 5 should be t + t^3 +
> O(t^5). This is what I get when I call flint directly from a C
> program. Are you getting something different?
I meant to write revert_series(6) which d
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:05:30 PM UTC+2, Jonas Jermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 21.07.2014 13:10, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jonas Jermann > wrote:
> >> I agree, but somehow the "flint import" details are slightly different.
> >> I also saw a different name
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Jonas Jermann wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On 21.07.2014 13:10, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jonas Jermann
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree, but somehow the "flint import" details are slightly different.
>>> I also saw a different name somewhere,
Hi
On 21.07.2014 13:10, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jonas Jermann wrote:
I agree, but somehow the "flint import" details are slightly different.
I also saw a different name somewhere, "reverse_series". So I was not
sure how to exactly import it for nmod. I would a
Hi Jonas,
>> Another idea (perhaps for a separate update) would be to add a sage
>> implementation of flint's algorithm for reversion over generic base
>> ring. This is Algorithm 1: "Fast Lagrange inversion" in
>> http://www.ams.org/journals/mcom/-000-00/S0025-5718-2014-02857-3/
>> (if you can
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jonas Jermann wrote:
> I agree, but somehow the "flint import" details are slightly different.
> I also saw a different name somewhere, "reverse_series". So I was not
> sure how to exactly import it for nmod. I would appreciate if someone
> familiar with flint coul
Hi Frederik
On 20.07.2014 15:20, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
There is also an nmod_poly_revert_series in flint for polynomials over
Z/nZ for word-size n. It would not hurt to wrap that function in the
same patch.
I agree, but somehow the "flint import" details are slightly different.
I also saw a
On Sunday, July 20, 2014 3:10:33 AM UTC+9, Jonas Jermann wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Could someone familiar with flint/sage enable flint's
> revert_series (for rational/integer polynomials)?
>
> (Sorry if it was already implemented somewhere and I missed it).
>
> Attached is a small, non-intrusive
Hi
On 19.07.2014 23:48, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
I can have a look next week.
Thanks!
Would you mind opening a ticket on trac for this?
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16685
Best
Jonas
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:10:33 PM UTC+2, Jonas Jermann wrote:
Hi all
Could someone
I can have a look next week.
Would you mind opening a ticket on trac for this?
On Saturday, July 19, 2014 8:10:33 PM UTC+2, Jonas Jermann wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Could someone familiar with flint/sage enable flint's
> revert_series (for rational/integer polynomials)?
>
> (Sorry if it was already
11 matches
Mail list logo
