2007/8/17, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ###
>
> flintqs-20070505: linux-ism for types. In lanzos.h add
>
> #ifdef __sun
> #define u_int32_t unsigned int
> #define u_int64_t unsigned long [?long?]
> #endif
>
> ##
>
> > malb, any idea? I don't know that area of the code very well. It looks
> > like a missing include.
>
> You can build libCF with and without IO support and apparently this got mixed
> up. This is why we build a stand-alone libCF/libfac after we built SINGULAR
> and libSINGULAR. This way we
On Thursday 16 August 2007, mabshoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had a closer look and the problem seems to originate mostly in the
> coercion code:
>
> I changed all single letter capital variables in
>
> sage/structure/coerce.pyx
> sage/structure/element.pyx
> sage/categories/action.pyx
> sage/structu
On 8/17/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here are some more fixes relative to 2.8.c + Robert Bradshaw's
> coercision-fix (which William should have gotten by now) + updated
> Singular package from sage.math/was/lj:
[..]
Holy frickin' wow!! Great work!
[...]
> cvxopt: missing complex.h
Hello,
here are some more fixes relative to 2.8.c + Robert Bradshaw's
coercision-fix (which William should have gotten by now) + updated
Singular package from sage.math/was/lj:
singular-20070816p1:
* Attemps to links, but fails (?because LN is improperly defined?): n -
s -> ln -s
* during make
> I did edit all the needed bits to make the coerce code compile, but
> now I get the following failure in multi_polynomial_libsingular:
>
> gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -
> fPIC -I/extra/home/mabshoff/SAGE-build/sage-2.8/local/include/singular
> -I/extra/ho
Hello,
I had a closer look and the problem seems to originate mostly in the
coercion code:
I changed all single letter capital variables in
sage/structure/coerce.pyx
sage/structure/element.pyx
sage/categories/action.pyx
sage/structure/parent.pyx
but I still get a compilation failure in coerce.
On 8/15/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just in case you wonder why the channel is empty: The IRC channel is called
> #SAGE-dev and not #sage-devel. We should probably change that.
OK, henceforth the irc.freenode.net channel is sage-devel.
By the way, an easy way to use irc fro
Hi,
just in case you wonder why the channel is empty: The IRC channel is called
#SAGE-dev and not #sage-devel. We should probably change that.
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb
_ja
