On 8/14/07, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first thing I checked upon investigation was if somebody had pushed
> the box into swap and that wasn't the case.
>
> An 'ls -1 > foo.txt' in the now infamous tmp-directory took in excess of
> 10 seconds which is pretty bad and that was
Bill Hart wrote:
>
Hello,
> To possibly add to the sage.math woes yesterday, I was testing a new
> memory manager just before the slowdown. It had the unusual property
> of allocating very many gigabytes of swap space in small chunks and
> very little actual memory. My presumption was that the s
To possibly add to the sage.math woes yesterday, I was testing a new
memory manager just before the slowdown. It had the unusual property
of allocating very many gigabytes of swap space in small chunks and
very little actual memory. My presumption was that the slowness had
something to do with sag
On Aug 13, 2007, at 18:51 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 8/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dortmund.de> wrote:
[snip]
> Robert Miller was cleaning up his home directories (we ran out
> of disk space yesterday) and ...
>8598 pts/16 DN+7:47 rm -rf tmp
> The problem is that the direc
William Stein wrote:
Hello,
>
> On 8/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I tried rsyncing htdocs to my mirror today and the file system on
>> sage.math is very slow (hours+ to rsync a 120MB file and still waiting
>> on that one). One oddity I came across is this one process:
>>
>> rl
On 8/13/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried rsyncing htdocs to my mirror today and the file system on
> sage.math is very slow (hours+ to rsync a 120MB file and still waiting
> on that one). One oddity I came across is this one process:
>
> rlmill8598 1.5 0.0 3852 512 pts/1
