[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-29 Thread Sébastien Labbé
Hi, I think some years ago, I had a similar problem because the documentation of some of the functions were not using raw string : r""" """ instead of """ """ Sébastien -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread Dan Drake
On Fri, 25 May 2012 at 06:33PM -0700, john_perry_usm wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up. Actually, you might want to cooperate with my > > patches, partly because some of them remove whitespace, but also > > because some have already been accepted into Sage 5.1: 12736, 12823, > > 12884. > > BUT! I

[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread john_perry_usm
Karl-Dieter > BTW, you can put keyword sd40.5 in any tickets you work on this > weekend, John :) Already did :-) john -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more option

[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread P Purkayastha
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 10:10:18 AM UTC+8, kcrisman wrote: > > > BTW, you can put keyword sd40.5 in any tickets you work on this > weekend, John :) Great! I will put sd40.5 on my tickets ;) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this gro

[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread kcrisman
On May 25, 9:33 pm, john_perry_usm wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up. Actually, you might want to cooperate with my > > patches, partly because some of them remove whitespace, but also > > because some have already been accepted into Sage 5.1: 12736, 12823, > > 12884. > > BUT! If you've already

[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread john_perry_usm
> Thanks for the heads up. Actually, you might want to cooperate with my > patches, partly because some of them remove whitespace, but also > because some have already been accepted into Sage 5.1: 12736, 12823, > 12884. BUT! If you've already incorporated 12736 & 12823 into your work, I'll modify

[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread john_perry_usm
Dan > I don't have any help for your doctesting, but be aware that > athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/2607I have a big > patch that hits a couple files in that directory, and you might want to > coordinate your work with those patches. (Or not, and ask *me* to > coordinate w

[sage-devel] Re: doctest coverage & testsuites

2012-05-25 Thread john_perry_usm
On May 25, 4:43 pm, David Roe wrote: > The sage-coverage script doesn't handle cython files very well. Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. regards john perry -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr