On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:13:13AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> > We probably do not have to worry much about that, since the issue will
> > most likely disappear with Javier's work on conjugacy classes. If I
> > remember well, the plan is to be able to do, for any (finite) group G:
> >
> >
Hi Nicolas,
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:16:08AM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
> > On 12-Mar-10, at 10:42 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> > >The distinction is one group is a matrix group and the other is a
> > >permutation group.
> > >
> > >sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
> > >sage/groups/per
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:16:08AM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 12-Mar-10, at 10:42 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> >The distinction is one group is a matrix group and the other is a
> >permutation group.
> >
> >sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
> >sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
>
On 12-Mar-10, at 10:42 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Hi Dan,
The distinction is one group is a matrix group and the other is a
permutation group.
sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
Presumably the method could be moved up the hierarchy a level. Can
you make a ti
> Presumably the method could be moved up the hierarchy a level. Can
> you make a ticket, or should I add it to my queue?
I made a ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8510
> I think I like the singular. ;-)
Me too.
Dan
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goog
Hi Dan,
The distinction is one group is a matrix group and the other is a
permutation group.
sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
Presumably the method could be moved up the hierarchy a level. Can
you make a ticket, or should I add it to my queue?
I think I
