As a note, I have now raised an
issue https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37438 about this on github.
On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 5:57:50 PM UTC Nils Bruin wrote:
> More importantly, the error also doesn't occur with
>
> S = Curve(f).riemann_surface(integration_method="heuristic")
>
> so
More importantly, the error also doesn't occur with
S = Curve(f).riemann_surface(integration_method="heuristic")
so it's indeed in the newer code. The fact that swapping x,z makes the
error disappear is also unsurprising: entirely different path integrals are
executed.
As an indication for wha
On Apr 17, 6:26 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> The 4.8 stuff is probably due to a previous Maxima.
>
> In the 5.0 betas, I suspect this particular one is related to things
> like
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8321
Some of the comments on that ticket also point out that in sage there
doesn'
The 4.8 stuff is probably due to a previous Maxima.
In the 5.0 betas, I suspect this particular one is related to things
like
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8321
GSL is hiccuping, I guess.
See also
sage: f.nintegral(x,-5,5)
ValueError: Maxima (via quadpack) cannot compute t
