On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
> My vote is for arcsin.
>
+1
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> +1
+1 (sorry, couldn't resist).
And I have no idea why we used sin^(-1)(x) before. Not even
Maxima does that by default:
(%i5) asin(sin(x));
(%o5)
My vote is for arcsin.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> +1
>
> +1
>
+1
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit t
>>> My vote is for arcsin.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>
> +1
+1
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
2009/6/14 Tim Lahey :
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the switch to pynac, the way we typeset arcsin and friends
>> changed.
>>
>> sage: version()
>> 'Sage Version 4.0.1, Release Date: 2009-06-06'
>> sage: latex(arcsin(x))
>> \arcsin\left(x\right)
>>
On Jun 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With the switch to pynac, the way we typeset arcsin and friends
> changed.
>
> sage: version()
> 'Sage Version 4.0.1, Release Date: 2009-06-06'
> sage: latex(arcsin(x))
> \arcsin\left(x\right)
>
> as opposed to:
>
> sage: version()
