On 6/27/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> No, there's an eval. In the context of SAGE, the eval is more useful
> >> than the (defensible, correct) IPython behaviour.
> >
> > FYI, I'm definitely *not* opposed to having an eval like Fernando is.
> > Thanks for your patch!!
>
> Hi W
> I'm going to guess you have an eval() somewhere in there for this to
> work. If not, just ignore the rest of this message and send me the
> patch for ipython itself :)
No, there's an eval. In the context of SAGE, the eval is more useful
than the (defensible, correct) IPython behaviour.
> It'
On 6/26/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interrogating literals works, more or less.
>
> sage: ?factor(6)
> Type: Factorization
> Base Class:
> String Form:2 * 3
> Length: 2
> Docstring:
>
I'm going to guess you have an eval() somewhere in there for
