On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ryan Hinton brought up a good point at #2651:
>
> Currently, matrix(3,{(1,1): 2}) gives the 3x2 sparse matrix
>
> [0 0]
> [0 2]
> [0 0]
>
>
> However, for other cases, if we specify just the number of rows, the
> re
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ryan Hinton brought up a good point at #2651:
>
> Currently, matrix(3,{(1,1): 2}) gives the 3x2 sparse matrix
>
> [0 0]
> [0 2]
> [0 0]
>
>
> However, for other cases, if we specify just the number of rows, the
> r
