On 2013-05-09, leif wrote:
> Simon King wrote:
>> PS:
>>
>> On 2013-05-09, Simon King wrote:
>>> The disadvantage of this approach: It will only test stuff that can be
>>> imported by Python---cdef methods do not appear in dir(O).
>>
>> And the worse disadvantage: This will only test importable m
Simon King wrote:
PS:
On 2013-05-09, Simon King wrote:
The disadvantage of this approach: It will only test stuff that can be
imported by Python---cdef methods do not appear in dir(O).
And the worse disadvantage: This will only test importable modules. It
will not test files.
Well, you jus
PS:
On 2013-05-09, Simon King wrote:
> The disadvantage of this approach: It will only test stuff that can be
> imported by Python---cdef methods do not appear in dir(O).
And the worse disadvantage: This will only test importable modules. It
will not test files.
--
You received this message be
Hi!
On 2013-05-08, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> I just made some tests (see attached file). Clearly Python uses
> introspection.
In spkg-check of my group cohomology spkg, I use the following basic approach,
also relying on introspection:
1. Start with a list of items (initially: The modules of t
Hey,
Also I'd also like to add that things like
class Foo:
__doc__ = \
"""
EXAMPLES::
sage: 1/0
"""
are not tested (which is why anything in a global options documentation is
not being tested).
Best,
Travis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
