On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:47:42PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I would very much appreciate someone fixing the singular spkg so flex and
> bison are never needed. Maybe we could touch the generated files in
> spkg-install
> right at the beginnig? It would be very nice to remove those two
> de
On 8/20/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that is true, but if the timestamp of the generated file is older
> than say the bison input Make will rebuild it. One just needs to
> update the spkg after running bison and flex manually. But since the
> spkg-install checks for bison and fle
On Aug 21, 12:12 am, "Juan M. Bello Rivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm not familiar with Singular, but after a quick look at the spkg I
> see the files generated by flex and bison are included in the package.
>
Yes, that is true, but if the timestamp of the generated file is older
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:28:04PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> > flex 2.5.33
> > bison 2.3
>
> That sounds about right. We had problems earlier with an older bison &
> the Singular 3.0.3
I'm not familiar with Singular, but after a quick look at the spkg I
see the files generated by flex and bis
On Aug 20, 11:08 pm, "didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I was going to post this on Trac as an "enhancement", but Trac seems
> to be down at the moment]
>
Hello,
trac is working for me at the moment.
> Hi,
> Current;y, the only official dependencies for SAGE are: "gcc, g++,
> ma
On 8/20/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [I was going to post this on Trac as an "enhancement", but Trac seems
> to be down at the moment]
I just checked and trac isn't down. If it ever does go down though, please
report immediately.
> Current;y, the only official dependencies
