[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
Thanks all for the input. I boiled it down to this ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19298 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubsc

[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 08:19:54 UTC-7, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > So, assuming gcc-4.7 (or equivalent) is needed by a package, what problems > are > to be expected? Linux is fine, but other supported systems? > Other? OSX is the only other, and it comes with a broken native compiler late

Re: [sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-23 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-09-23 17:19, Ralf Stephan wrote: So, assuming gcc-4.7 (or equivalent) is needed by a package, what problems are to be expected? None. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving email

[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-23 Thread Ralf Stephan
So, assuming gcc-4.7 (or equivalent) is needed by a package, what problems are to be expected? Linux is fine, but other supported systems? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fr

[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-21 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 6:38:50 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > Afaik we already require C++11 support to compile Pynac Yes, Pynac git master requires it but we're still installing backported versions (0.3.9.x vs 0.4.x). The ticket that never got finished was http://trac.sagemath.org/t

[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-21 Thread Volker Braun
Afaik we already require C++11 support to compile Pynac (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/DeT2E8IzTGs/Z_GDKbh06X8J). If not then we *should* require C++11 because its much better than without... On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 1:47:17 PM UTC+2, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybod

Re: [sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-21 Thread Nathann Cohen
> Then why didn't you just ask that right away? - Because I can deduce my answer from the version of GCC (if we always compile with GCC). - Because whoever knows the version of GCC may not know if it supports C++11, and so may not answer. - Because knowing the version of GCC is of a wider use than

Re: [sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-21 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2015-09-21 14:12, Nathann Cohen wrote: I want to know if I can compile c++ files with -std=c++11. Then why didn't you just ask that right away? If you're serious about C++11 support, please open a ticket and we can continue discussing there. -- You received this message because you are s

[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-21 Thread Nathann Cohen
> > I guess the configure script is made to check it is recent enough and > provides what is needed to build Sage. > Or at least that it can build our GCC. > I want to know if I can compile c++ files with -std=c++11. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

[sage-devel] Re: What can we assume about our C compiler

2015-09-21 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 1:47:17 PM UTC+2, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > What can we assume on our C compiler? Is it always gcc? Is it always > recent? > > I guess the configure script is made to check it is recent enough and provides what is needed to build Sage. Or a